Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 11:6:149.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.

Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer

Godfred O Boateng  1 , Torsten B Neilands  2 , Edward A Frongillo  3 , Hugo R Melgar-Quiñonez  4 , Sera L Young  1   5
Affiliations
Review

Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer

Godfred O Boateng et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.

Keywords: content validity; factor analysis; item reduction; psychometric evaluation; scale development; tests of dimensionality; tests of reliability; tests of validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An overview of the three phases and nine steps of scale development and validation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Application. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; Publications (2012).
    1. Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Introduction to Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; (2011).
    1. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press; (2015).
    1. McCoach DB, Gable RK, Madura JP. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain. School and Corporate Applications, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Springer; (2013).
    1. Morgado FFR, Meireles JFF, Neves CM, Amaral ACS, Ferreira MEC. Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicol Reflex E Crítica (2018) 30:3 10.1186/s41155-016-0057-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources