An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation
- PMID: 29882307
- DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12321
An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation
Abstract
Objectives: This study assessed accuracy and bias in people's perceptions of their romantic partner's adoption of short-term (avoid conflict) and long-term (later health) motives for interpersonally regulating their health behaviours.
Design: A cross-sectional Web-based survey of 114 cohabiting romantic couples (N = 228 individuals) living in the United States.
Methods: Romantic partners separately completed measures of their short-term and long-term motives for self-regulation and partner regulation of health behaviours, as well as their perceptions of partner regulation of their own health behaviours. Dyadic path analyses were conducted using the truth and bias model of judgement.
Results: Targets of interpersonal regulation perceived their romantic partner's short-term and long-term motives for influencing their (the target's) health behaviour with significant accuracy. However, targets' perceptions of their partner's motives simultaneously contained about the same amount of projection of the target's own short- and long-term motives for self-regulation. There was no similarity between the target's motives for self-regulation and their partner's motives for interpersonal regulation. Targets also tended to underestimate their partner's long-term motives for interpersonal regulation.
Conclusions: Although people are somewhat accurate in their perceptions of their romantic partner's motives for attempting to influence their health behaviours, their perceptions are also contaminated by biases. This suggests that people's judgements about their partner's motives could be substantially improved. Statement of contribution What is known about this subject? Romantic partners use social influence tactics to improve each other's health behaviours. People who perceive their partner's influence attempts positively often make healthy changes. Misperceptions of a partner's motives for influence attempts may have health and relationship implications. What does this study add? People are aware of whether partner influence attempts are motivated by convenience or concern. People also project their own motives for self-regulating health behaviours onto their partner.
Keywords: Accuracy; Bias; Health Behaviour; Interpersonal Regulation; Person Perception; Physical Health; Romantic Relationships; Self-Regulation; Social Control; Temporal Orientation.
© 2018 The British Psychological Society.
Similar articles
-
Consideration of Future Consequences Influences Involvement in Romantic Partners' Health.Health Commun. 2021 May;36(5):639-649. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1733229. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Health Commun. 2021. PMID: 32122172
-
Perceptions of a romantic partner's approach and avoidance motives: Accuracy, bias, and emotional cues.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Sep;119(3):695-712. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000256. Epub 2019 Jun 13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31192633
-
Inferring a partner's ideal discrepancies: accuracy, projection, and the communicative role of interpersonal behavior.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):217-33. doi: 10.1037/a0033009. Epub 2013 May 27. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23713702
-
A meta-analytic review of accuracy and bias in romantic partner perceptions.Psychol Bull. 2023 Sep-Oct;149(9-10):580-610. doi: 10.1037/bul0000405. Psychol Bull. 2023. PMID: 38713750 Review.
-
The Dyadic Health Influence Model.Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022 Feb;26(1):3-34. doi: 10.1177/10888683211054897. Epub 2021 Dec 7. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2022. PMID: 34873983 Review.
Cited by
-
Geographic distribution and predictors of diagnostic delays among possible TB patients in Uganda.Public Health Action. 2023 Sep 21;13(3):70-76. doi: 10.5588/pha.23.0010. Public Health Action. 2023. PMID: 37736583 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources