Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6660.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25224-y.

Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Affiliations

Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris)

Shanis Barnard et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Certain personality traits (e.g. anxiousness, fearfulness), are known to affect the cognitive processing of environmental stimuli, such as the judgement of ambiguous stimuli (judgement bias). Our aim was to assess if personality traits are predictive of a more or less 'pessimistic' or 'optimistic' judgement bias in the domestic dog. We assessed dog personality (N = 31) using two validated protocols: the Dog Mentality Assessment (standardised battery test) and the CBARQ (owner-based survey). We used a common task based on the animals' latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions (Near Positive, Middle, Near Negative) between a baited (Positive) and a non-baited food bowl (Negative) to assess judgement bias. Linear Mixed Model analyses revealed that dogs scoring higher on sociability, excitability and non-social-fear had shorter response latencies to bowls in an ambiguous location, indicating a more 'optimistic' bias. In contrast, dogs scoring higher on separation-related-behaviour and dog-directed-fear/aggression traits were more likely to judge an ambiguous stimulus as leading to a negative outcome, indicating a more 'pessimistic' bias. Results, partially consistent with previous findings in humans, indicate that personality plays a role in the cognitive processing of environmental stimuli in the domestic dog.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Latency to reach the bowl in the five locations Positive (P) Near Positive (NP), Middle (M), Near Negative (NN) and Negative (N). Results refer to the test trials only. Boxplots represent medians (bar within the box), upper and lower quartiles (borders of box), lowest and highest cases within 1.5 times the IQR (bottom and top whiskers) and outliers (circles).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Depiction of the food bowl positions used in the judgement bias task [P = Positive position (bowl baited with food); NP = Near Positive; M = Middle; NN = Near Negative; N = Negative position (bowl devoid of food)].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;118:161–181. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023. - DOI
    1. Mineka S, Sutton SK. Cognitive Biases and the Emotional Disorders. Psychol. Sci. 1992;3:65–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00260.x. - DOI
    1. Destrez A, Deiss V, Belzung C, Lee C, Boissy A. Does reduction of fearfulness tend to reduce pessimistic-like judgment in lambs? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;139:233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.006. - DOI
    1. Bethell EJ, Holmes A, MacLarnon A, Semple S. Evidence that emotion mediates social attention in rhesus macaques. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044387. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harding EJ, Paul ES, Mendl M. Animal behavior - Cognitive bias and affective state. Nature. 2004;427:312–312. doi: 10.1038/427312a. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources