Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris)
- PMID: 29703989
- PMCID: PMC5924375
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25224-y
Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris)
Abstract
Certain personality traits (e.g. anxiousness, fearfulness), are known to affect the cognitive processing of environmental stimuli, such as the judgement of ambiguous stimuli (judgement bias). Our aim was to assess if personality traits are predictive of a more or less 'pessimistic' or 'optimistic' judgement bias in the domestic dog. We assessed dog personality (N = 31) using two validated protocols: the Dog Mentality Assessment (standardised battery test) and the CBARQ (owner-based survey). We used a common task based on the animals' latency to approach a bowl placed in one of three ambiguous positions (Near Positive, Middle, Near Negative) between a baited (Positive) and a non-baited food bowl (Negative) to assess judgement bias. Linear Mixed Model analyses revealed that dogs scoring higher on sociability, excitability and non-social-fear had shorter response latencies to bowls in an ambiguous location, indicating a more 'optimistic' bias. In contrast, dogs scoring higher on separation-related-behaviour and dog-directed-fear/aggression traits were more likely to judge an ambiguous stimulus as leading to a negative outcome, indicating a more 'pessimistic' bias. Results, partially consistent with previous findings in humans, indicate that personality plays a role in the cognitive processing of environmental stimuli in the domestic dog.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5924375/bin/41598_2018_25224_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5924375/bin/41598_2018_25224_Fig2_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01689-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36094748 Free PMC article.
-
A promising novel judgement bias test to evaluate affective states in dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2022 Aug;25(4):837-852. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01596-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4. Anim Cogn. 2022. PMID: 34982301
-
Using judgment bias test in pet and shelter dogs (Canis familiaris): Methodological and statistical caveats.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 27;15(10):e0241344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241344. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33108399 Free PMC article.
-
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020. PMID: 32682742 Review.
-
You know what? I'm happy. Cognitive bias is not related to personality but is induced by pair-housing in canaries (Serinus canaria).Behav Processes. 2017 Jan;134:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Behav Processes. 2017. PMID: 27697598 Review.
Cited by
-
Trait sensitivity to stress and cognitive bias processes in fish: A brief overview.Personal Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;7:e3. doi: 10.1017/pen.2023.14. eCollection 2024. Personal Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38384666 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Rivalry and admiration-seeking in a social competition: From traits to behaviors through contextual cues.Personal Disord. 2023 Jul;14(4):429-440. doi: 10.1037/per0000610. Epub 2023 Jan 2. Personal Disord. 2023. PMID: 36595438 Free PMC article.
-
Limitations of Spatial Judgment Bias Test Application in Horses (Equus ferus caballus).Animals (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;12(21):3014. doi: 10.3390/ani12213014. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36359138 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of repeated testing on judgement bias in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01689-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36094748 Free PMC article.
-
Judgement bias of group housed gestating sows predicted by behavioral traits, but not physical measures of welfare.PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264258. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35213574 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mendl M, Burman OHP, Parker RMA, Paul ES. Cognitive bias as an indicator of animal emotion and welfare: Emerging evidence and underlying mechanisms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2009;118:161–181. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.023. - DOI
-
- Mineka S, Sutton SK. Cognitive Biases and the Emotional Disorders. Psychol. Sci. 1992;3:65–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00260.x. - DOI
-
- Destrez A, Deiss V, Belzung C, Lee C, Boissy A. Does reduction of fearfulness tend to reduce pessimistic-like judgment in lambs? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2012;139:233–241. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.04.006. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources