The relative contribution of metacognitions and attentional control to the severity of gambling in problem gamblers
- PMID: 29531974
- PMCID: PMC5845956
- DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.02.001
The relative contribution of metacognitions and attentional control to the severity of gambling in problem gamblers
Abstract
The present study explored the relationship between metacognitions, attentional control, and the severity of gambling in problem gamblers. One hundred and twenty six problem gamblers completed the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales 21, the Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire 30, the Attentional Control Scale, and the Problem Gambling Severity Index. Results revealed that negative affect, four out of five metacognitions factors (positive beliefs about worry, negative beliefs about thoughts concerning danger and uncontrollability, cognitive confidence and beliefs about the need to control thoughts), and all attentional control factors (focusing, shifting and flexible control of thought) were correlated, in the predicted directions, with the severity of gambling. The same metacognitions were also found to be correlated, in the predicted directions, with attention focusing, however only negative beliefs about thoughts concerning danger and uncontrollability and cognitive confidence were found to be correlated with attention shifting and flexible control of thought. A hierarchical regression analysis showed that beliefs about the need to control thoughts were the only predictor of the severity of gambling controlling for negative affect. Overall these findings support the hypotheses and are consistent with the metacognitive model of psychological dysfunction. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords: Addictive behaviours; Attentional control; Gambling; Metacognition; Metacognitions; Problem gambling.
Similar articles
-
The relationship among metacognitions, attentional control, and state anxiety.Cogn Behav Ther. 2010;39(1):64-71. doi: 10.1080/16506070902991791. Cogn Behav Ther. 2010. PMID: 19735025
-
Metacognitions in problem gambling.J Gambl Stud. 2011 Mar;27(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9193-1. J Gambl Stud. 2011. PMID: 20429027
-
Metacognitions, rumination, and worry in personality disorder.J Affect Disord. 2021 Oct 1;293:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Jun 18. J Affect Disord. 2021. PMID: 34175593
-
A systematic review of the relationship between generic and specific metacognitive beliefs and emotion dysregulation: A metacognitive model of emotion dysregulation.Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Jan-Feb;31(1):e2961. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2961. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024. PMID: 38357852 Review.
-
Dysfunctional metacognition across psychopathologies: A meta-analytic review.Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;45:139-153. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Eur Psychiatry. 2017. PMID: 28763680 Review.
Cited by
-
Altered resting-state functional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex with intrinsic brain networks in male problematic smartphone users.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 3;13:1008557. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1008557. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 36262635 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of the Smartphone Distraction Scale in Chinese College Students: Validity, Reliability and Influencing Factors.Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 16;13:859640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859640. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35782432 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the contribution of metacognitions and expectancies to problematic smartphone use.J Behav Addict. 2021 Sep 28;10(3):788-798. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00066. J Behav Addict. 2021. PMID: 34613932 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling the Contribution of Metacognitions, Impulsiveness, and Thought Suppression to Behavioural Addictions in Adolescents.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3820. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073820. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33917425 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Dimensions of Smartphone Distraction: Development, Validation, Measurement Invariance, and Latent Mean Differences of the Smartphone Distraction Scale (SDS).Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 8;12:642634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642634. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33762981 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cowlishaw S., Merkouris S., Dowling N., Anderson C., Jackson A., Thomas S. Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (Review) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;(11) - PubMed
-
- Crawford J.R., Henry J.D. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2003;42:111–131. - PubMed
-
- Derryberry D., Reed M.A. Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2002;111:225–236. - PubMed
-
- Gaboury A., Ladouceur R. Erroneous perceptions and gambling. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality. 1989;4:411–420.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources