Beverages containing low energy sweeteners do not differ from water in their effects on appetite, energy intake and food choices in healthy, non-obese French adults
- PMID: 29526693
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.03.007
Beverages containing low energy sweeteners do not differ from water in their effects on appetite, energy intake and food choices in healthy, non-obese French adults
Abstract
The usefulness of replacement of caloric sugars by low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) for weight management has been questioned on the grounds that the uncoupling of LCS sweet taste and dietary energy may confuse physiological mechanisms, leading potentially to higher energy and sugar intake. The aim of the present study was to determine whether LCS beverages compared to water, when consumed with meals, differ in their effects on energy and food intake in acute trials and after long-term habituation. Ad libitum food intake of 166 (80 women; 86 men) healthy non-obese adults (BMI between 19 and 28 kg/m2), infrequent consumers of LCS was measured in four 2-consecutive-day testing sessions (Day 1 in the laboratory, Day 2 free-living). During the first 3 sessions, held one-week apart, participants were required to drink either water or commercial non-carbonated LCS lemonade (330 ml) with their main meals (randomised cross-over design). On Day 1, motivational ratings were obtained using visual analogue scales and ad libitum food intakes (amounts and types of foods selected) were measured using the plate waste method. On Day 2, participants reported their ad libitum intakes using a food diary. After Session 3, participants were randomly assigned to the LCS habituation group or to the water control group. The habituation (660 ml LCS lemonade daily vs 660 ml water) lasted 5 weeks. The fourth and final test session measured food intakes and motivational ratings after habituation. Water and LCS beverage did not differ in their effects on total energy intake, macronutrient intakes or the selection of sweet foods and on motivational ratings. Similar results were obtained in both LCS-naïve and LCS-habituated individuals.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02297880.
Keywords: Energy intake; Human subjects; Low calories sweeteners (LCS); Not habitual LCS users; Sugar intake; Sweet/savory food choices.
Republished in
-
Reprint of "Beverages containing low energy sweeteners do not differ from water in their effects on appetite, energy intake and food choices in healthy, non-obese French adults".Appetite. 2018 Oct 1;129:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.036. Epub 2018 Jul 9. Appetite. 2018. PMID: 30005211
Similar articles
-
Reprint of "Beverages containing low energy sweeteners do not differ from water in their effects on appetite, energy intake and food choices in healthy, non-obese French adults".Appetite. 2018 Oct 1;129:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.036. Epub 2018 Jul 9. Appetite. 2018. PMID: 30005211
-
The relative reinforcing value of sweet versus savory snack foods after consumption of sugar- or non-nutritive sweetened beverages.Appetite. 2017 May 1;112:143-149. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Jan 23. Appetite. 2017. PMID: 28126491 Clinical Trial.
-
Do low-calorie sweetened beverages help to control food cravings? Two experimental studies.Physiol Behav. 2019 Sep 1;208:112500. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 19. Physiol Behav. 2019. PMID: 30902635
-
Low-Calorie Sweetened Beverages and Cardiometabolic Health: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2018 Aug 28;138(9):e126-e140. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000569. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 30354445 Review.
-
The role of low-calorie sweeteners in the prevention and management of overweight and obesity: evidence v. conjecture.Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):230-238. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117004049. Epub 2017 Nov 23. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018. PMID: 29166970 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute and two-week effects of neotame, stevia rebaudioside M and sucrose-sweetened biscuits on postprandial appetite and endocrine response in adults with overweight/obesity-a randomised crossover trial from the SWEET consortium.EBioMedicine. 2024 Apr;102:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105005. Epub 2024 Mar 28. EBioMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38553262 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ultraprocessed Foods and Obesity Risk: A Critical Review of Reported Mechanisms.Adv Nutr. 2023 Jul;14(4):718-738. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 18. Adv Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37080461 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Effect of Artificial Sweeteners Use on Sweet Taste Perception and Weight Loss Efficacy: A Review.Nutrients. 2022 Mar 16;14(6):1261. doi: 10.3390/nu14061261. Nutrients. 2022. PMID: 35334918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Obesity and Sex-Related Associations With Differential Effects of Sucralose vs Sucrose on Appetite and Reward Processing: A Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26313. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34581796 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Energy Intake, Body Weight and Postprandial Glycemia in Healthy and with Altered Glycemic Response Rats.Foods. 2021 Apr 28;10(5):958. doi: 10.3390/foods10050958. Foods. 2021. PMID: 33924861 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources