Can there be a moral obligation to participate in biomedical research?
- PMID: 29377101
- DOI: 10.1111/eci.12896
Can there be a moral obligation to participate in biomedical research?
Abstract
In clinical medicine, the moral obligation to care for the individual patient is absolute. Patient care means at least and by negative terms to minimize any risk of treatment. In this context, the question arises about the compatibility of clinical ethics and human biomedical research ethics. Or conversely, is there a common ground between the two? At the opposite end of the field between clinical ethics and biomedical research ethics is the proposal of an obligation to participate in biomedical research, which is argued for on the basis of biomedical knowledge being a public good available to the community as a whole. While patient accrual during a clinical investigation would certainly be facilitated by obligatory research participation, and the data obtained would be-at first sight-more representative for the population studied, the still feasible refusal to participate would be stigmatizing and as such detrimental for the patient-physician relation. This essay seeks to provide a reply to the titled question by focusing on aspects such as individual vs common medical claims, shared grounds between the two and an important document of medical research ethics, that is the Nuremberg code.
Keywords: Belmont report; Nuremberg code; biomedical research ethics; clinical ethics; informed consent; public goods.
© 2018 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation.
Similar articles
-
Reflections on 'Rethinking research ethics'.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):1-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590944076. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036649 No abstract available.
-
Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research.J Med Ethics. 2018 Jun;44(6):392-396. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104550. Epub 2018 Jan 22. J Med Ethics. 2018. PMID: 29358219
-
Does research ethics rest on a mistake? The common good, reasonable risk and social justice.Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):37-9; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590927750. Am J Bioeth. 2005. PMID: 16036656 No abstract available.
-
Best practice & research in anaesthesiology issue on new approaches in clinical research ethics in clinical research.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):569-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.003. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011. PMID: 22099922 Review.
-
The duty to exclude: excluding people at undue risk from research.Clin Invest Med. 1994 Apr;17(2):115-22. Clin Invest Med. 1994. PMID: 8004847 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
