Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;5(4):522-526.
doi: 10.5750/ejpch.v5i4.1263.

Trust and the Ethical Conduct of Community-Engaged Research

Dmitry Khodyakov  1 , Lisa Mikesell  2 , Elizabeth Bromley  3
Affiliations

Trust and the Ethical Conduct of Community-Engaged Research

Dmitry Khodyakov et al. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2017.

Abstract

Community-engaged research (CEnR), which emphasizes equal participation of academic and community partners in research, seeks to improve public trust in science. Unfortunately, there is a dearth of rigorous empirical research on trust as a core component of ethical conduct of CEnR. Drawing on data collected from a project on the ethics of CEnR, this commentary discusses benefits and risks of trust and uses the concept of embeddedness to explain how public trust in science may be increased. We argue that in developing and maintaining trust, partners must balance scientific rigor with community relevance and cultural appropriateness of research. They must strike a balance between working with the same limited pool of trusted partners, which can speed research but slow wider acceptance of science, and extending their trust to new partners, which can broaden acceptance of science but slow research. Practitioners may facilitate the development of trust in science by gradually expanding the pool of partners they choose their collaborators from.

Keywords: Community-Engaged Research; Embeddedness; Research Ethics; Trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker EA, Chan D, Wallerstein N. Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity. Qualitative Health Research. 2014 doi: 10.1177/1049732314557084. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bromley E, Mikesell L, Jones F, Khodyakov D. From Subject to Participant: Ethics and the Evolving Role of Community in Health Research. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(5):900–908. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christopher S, Watts V, McCormick AKHG, Young S. Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health. 2008;98(8):1398–1406. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DMM. Distrust, race, and research. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2002;162(21):2458–2463. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.21.2458. - PubMed
    1. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1999;14(9):537–546. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources