Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Guidelines: Update of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Policies and Procedures
- PMID: 29254528
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.034
Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Guidelines: Update of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Policies and Procedures
Abstract
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provides independent, objective, and scientifically rigorous recommendations for clinical preventive services. A primary concern is to avoid even the appearance of members having special interests that might influence their ability to judge evidence and formulate unbiased recommendations. The conflicts of interest policy for the USPSTF is described, as is the formal process by which best practices were incorporated to update the policy. The USPSTF performed a literature review, conducted key informant interviews, and reviewed conflicts of interest policies of ten similar organizations. Important findings included transparency and public accessibility; full disclosure of financial relationships; disclosure of non-financial relationships (that create the potential for bias and compromise a member's objective judgment); disclosure of family members' conflicts of interests; and establishment of appropriate reporting periods. Controversies in best practices include the threshold of financial disclosures, ease of access to conflicts of interest policies and declarations, vague definition of non-financial biases, and request for family members' conflicts of interests (particularly those that are non-financial in nature). The USPSTF conflicts of interest policy includes disclosures for immediate family members, a clear non-financial conflicts of interest definition, long look-back period and application of the policy to prospective members. Conflicts of interest is solicited from all members every 4 months, formally reviewed, adjudicated, and made publicly available. The USPSTF conflicts of interest policy is publicly available as part of the USPSTF Procedure Manual. A continuous improvement process can be applied to conflicts of interest policies to enhance public trust in members of panels, such as the USPSTF, that produce clinical guidelines and recommendations.
Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's conflict of interest policy.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):B47-B57.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 22. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32971012
-
A comparison of policy provisions for managing "financial" and "non-financial" interests across health-related research organizations: A qualitative content analysis.Account Res. 2020 May;27(4):212-237. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1748015. Epub 2020 Apr 9. Account Res. 2020. PMID: 32233796
-
Conflict of Interest Policies and Industry Relationships of Guideline Development Group Members: A Cross-Sectional Study of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Depression.Account Res. 2017;24(2):99-115. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2016.1251319. Epub 2016 Oct 24. Account Res. 2017. PMID: 27901595
-
Guideline funding and conflicts of interest: article 4 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):234-42. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-057ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256165 Review.
-
Self-study of values, beliefs, and conflict of interest: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4 Suppl):S24-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181642f07. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008. PMID: 18204395 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021.Cureus. 2023 Mar 23;15(3):e36567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36567. eCollection 2023 Mar. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37095789 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-sectional analysis of pharmaceutical payments to Japanese board-certified gastroenterologists between 2016 and 2019.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):e068237. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068237. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37072354 Free PMC article.
-
Perspective: Examining Conflicts of Interest for Professional Service within the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee.Adv Nutr. 2023 May;14(3):432-437. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Adv Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36997092 Free PMC article.
-
Examination of Potential Industry Conflicts of Interest and Disclosures by Contributors to Online Medical Resource Databases.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220155. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20155. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35788670 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Conflicts of Interest among Participants of the Japanese Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Jun;17(6):819-826. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14661121. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 35623883 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources