Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 Feb 1;75(2):219-226.
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3517.

Effect of High-Intensity Treadmill Exercise on Motor Symptoms in Patients With De Novo Parkinson Disease: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of High-Intensity Treadmill Exercise on Motor Symptoms in Patients With De Novo Parkinson Disease: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Margaret Schenkman et al. JAMA Neurol. .

Abstract

Importance: Parkinson disease is a progressive neurologic disorder. Limited evidence suggests endurance exercise modifies disease severity, particularly high-intensity exercise.

Objectives: To examine the feasibility and safety of high-intensity treadmill exercise in patients with de novo Parkinson disease who are not taking medication and whether the effect on motor symptoms warrants a phase 3 trial.

Design, setting, and participants: The Study in Parkinson Disease of Exercise (SPARX) was a phase 2, multicenter randomized clinical trial with 3 groups and masked assessors. Individuals from outpatient and community-based clinics were enrolled from May 1, 2012, through November 30, 2015, with the primary end point at 6 months. Individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1 or 2) aged 40 to 80 years within 5 years of diagnosis who were not exercising at moderate intensity greater than 3 times per week and not expected to need dopaminergic medication within 6 months participated in this study. A total of 384 volunteers were screened by telephone; 128 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups (high-intensity exercise, moderate-intensity exercise, or control).

Interventions: High-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 80%-85% maximum heart rate [n = 43]), moderate-intensity treadmill exercise (4 days per week, 60%-65% maximum heart rate [n = 45]), or wait-list control (n = 40) for 6 months.

Main outcomes and measures: Feasibility measures were adherence to prescribed heart rate and exercise frequency of 3 days per week and safety. The clinical outcome was 6-month change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score.

Results: A total of 128 patients were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 64 [9] years; age range, 40-80 years; 73 [57.0%] male; and 108 [84.4%] non-Hispanic white). Exercise rates were 2.8 (95% CI, 2.4-3.2) days per week at 80.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-81.7%) maximum heart rate in the high-intensity group and 3.2 (95% CI, 2.8-3.6; P = .13) days per week at 65.9% (95% CI, 64.2%-67.7%) maximum heart rate in the moderate-intensity group (P < .001). The mean change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score in the high-intensity group was 0.3 (95% CI, -1.7 to 2.3) compared with 3.2 (95% CI, 1.4 to 5.1) in the usual care group (P = .03). The high-intensity group, but not the moderate-intensity group, reached the predefined nonfutility threshold compared with the control group. Anticipated adverse musculoskeletal events were not severe.

Conclusions and relevance: High-intensity treadmill exercise may be feasible and prescribed safely for patients with Parkinson disease. An efficacy trial is warranted to determine whether high-intensity treadmill exercise produces meaningful clinical benefits in de novo Parkinson disease.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01506479.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of Patient Participation in the Study
PD indicates Parkinson disease; UKBB, UK Parkinson���s Disease Society Brain Bank.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Study Outcomes
A, Percentage maximum heart rate for each intervention group at 60% to 65% maximum heart rate and 80% to 85% across weeks 9 to 26. B, Mean days exercised for each intervention group across weeks 9 to 26. In A and B, symbols represent the means and bars are the SEs. Trends over time were tested using linear mixed models. C, Distribution of the 6-month Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor change scores (6 months minus baseline), in which a positive change indicates worsening of motor symptoms. Each boxplot contains the median (horizontal line in the box), the upper quartile (75th percentile, top of box), the lower quartile (25th percentile, bottom of box), the mean (diamonds), whiskers, and outliers that are beyond 1.5 times the interquartile range (75th percentile minus the 25th percentile) from the 25th or 75th percentiles (circles). For usual care, the whiskers extend to the observed minimum and maximum. For the 80% to 85% maximum heart rate and the 60% to 65% maximum heart rate, the whiskers extend to the maximum and minimum values observed that were not outliers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):896-912. - PubMed
    1. Shulman LM, Gruber-Baldini AL, Anderson KE, et al. . The evolution of disability in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(6):790-796. - PubMed
    1. Connolly BS, Lang AE. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1670-1683. - PubMed
    1. Smith AD, Zigmond MJ. Can the brain be protected through exercise? lessons from an animal model of parkinsonism. Exp Neurol. 2003;184(1):31-39. - PubMed
    1. Zigmond MJ, Smeyne RJ. Exercise: is it a neuroprotective and if so, how does it work? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20(suppl 1):S123-S127. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data