Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov 21:8:1922.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01922. eCollection 2017.

Love Influences Reproductive Success in Humans

Affiliations

Love Influences Reproductive Success in Humans

Piotr Sorokowski et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

As love seems to be universal, researchers have attempted to find its biological basis. However, no studies till date have shown its direct association with reproductive success, which is broadly known to be a good measure of fitness. Here, we show links between love, as defined by the Sternberg Triangular Theory of Love, and reproductive success among the Hadza-traditional hunter-gatherer population. We found that commitment and reproductive success were positively and consistently related in both sexes, with number of children showing negative and positive associations with intimacy and passion, respectively, only among women. Our study may shed new light on the meaning of love in humans' evolutionary past, especially in traditional hunter-gatherer societies in which individuals, not their parents, were responsible for partner choice. We suggest that passion and commitment may be the key factors that increase fitness, and therefore, that selection promoted love in human evolution. However, further studies in this area are recommended.

Keywords: Hadza; commitment; human evolution; hunter-gatherers; number of children; passion; romantic (love); sexual selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sex differences in love components.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interactions between sex and love aspects on number of children. (A) demonstrates different effects of intimacy on number of children among women and men: the effect is negative and significant among women (B = −0.26, SE = 0.11, p = 0.02), but not among men (B = 0.15, SE = 0.08, p = 0.07). (B) shows a positive effect of passion on number of children among women (B = 0.24, SE = 0.12, p = 0.05), but not among men (B = −0.16, SE = 0.12, p = 0.19). (C) illustrates positive effects of commitment on number of children; the effect is significant among men (B = 0.27, SE = 0.12, p = 0.02) but not women (B = 0.17, SE = 0.16; p = 0.30).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Arranged and non-arranged marriages have similar reproductive outcomes in Nepal.
    Agey E. Agey E. Sci Rep. 2024 May 14;14(1):11080. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61467-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38744943 Free PMC article.
  • Validation and measurement properties of the Male and Female Fertility Knowledge Inventories (MFKI and FFKI) in Iranian couples.
    Mashayekh-Amiri S, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Molaie B, Rashidi F, Hemati E, Aliasghari F, Mirghafourvand M. Mashayekh-Amiri S, et al. Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 23;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01795-0. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 38649965
  • What's love got to do with jealousy?
    Fernandez AM, Barbato MT, Cordero B, Acevedo Y. Fernandez AM, et al. Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1249556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249556. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37842714 Free PMC article.
  • Mate value, intrasexual competition and sociosexual desire drive Brazilian women's well-being.
    Mafra AL, Defelipe RP, Varella MAC, Townsend JM, Valentova JV. Mafra AL, et al. Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 10;3:e25. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.18. eCollection 2021. Evol Hum Sci. 2021. PMID: 37588543 Free PMC article.
  • Modernization, collectivism, and gender equality predict love experiences in 45 countries.
    Sorokowski P, Kowal M, Sternberg RJ, Aavik T, Akello G, Alhabahba MM, Alm C, Amjad N, Anjum A, Asao K, Atama CS, Atamtürk Duyar D, Ayebare R, Conroy-Beam D, Bendixen M, Bensafia A, Bizumic B, Boussena M, Buss DM, Butovskaya M, Can S, Carrier A, Cetinkaya H, Croy I, Cueto RM, Czub M, Dronova D, Dural S, Duyar I, Ertugrul B, Espinosa A, Estevan I, Esteves CS, Frackowiak T, Garduño JC, González KU, Guemaz F, Halamová M, Herak I, Horvat M, Hromatko I, Hui CM, Jaafar JL, Jiang F, Kafetsios K, Kavčič T, Kennair LEO, Kervyn N, Ha TTK, Khilji IA, Köbis NC, Kostic A, Lan HM, Láng A, Lennard GR, León E, Lindholm T, Linh TT, Lopez G, Van Luot N, Mailhos A, Manesi Z, Martinez R, McKerchar SL, Meskó N, Pejičić M, Misra G, Monaghan C, Mora EC, Moya-Garófano A, Musil B, Natividade JC, Nizharadze G, Oberzaucher E, Oleszkiewicz A, Omar-Fauzee MS, Onyishi IE, Özener B, Pagani AF, Pakalniskiene V, Parise M, Pazhoohi F, Pisanski A, Pisanski K, Ponciano E, Popa C, Prokop P, Rizwan M, Sainz M, Salkičević S, Sargautyte R, Sarmány-Schuller I, Schmehl S, Shahid A, Sharad S, Siddiqui RS, Simonetti F, Tadinac M, Vauclair CM, Vega LD, Walter KV, Widarini DA, Yoo G, Zaťková M, Zupančič M, Sorokowska A. Sorokowski P, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 14;13(1):773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26663-4. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36641519 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Acker M., Davis M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: a test of the Triangular Theory of Love. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 9, 21–50. 10.1177/0265407592091002 - DOI
    1. Ahmetoglu G., Swami V., Chamorro-Premuzic T. (2010). The relationship between dimensions of love, personality, and relationship length. Arch. Sex. Behav. 39, 1181–1190. 10.1007/s10508-009-9515-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Apicella C. L., Marlowe F. W., Fowler J. H., Christakis N. A. (2012). Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481, 497–501. 10.1038/nature10736 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aron A., Henkemeyer L. (1995). Marital satisfaction and passionate love. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 12, 139–146. 10.1177/0265407595121010 - DOI
    1. Bartels A., Zeki S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. NeuroImage 21, 1155–1166. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003 - DOI - PubMed