Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec 19;50(12):2915-2924.
doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00305. Epub 2017 Nov 21.

Molecular Tension Probes for Imaging Forces at the Cell Surface

Affiliations
Review

Molecular Tension Probes for Imaging Forces at the Cell Surface

Yang Liu et al. Acc Chem Res. .

Abstract

Mechanical forces are essential for a variety of biological processes ranging from transcription and translation to cell adhesion, migration, and differentiation. Through the activation of mechanosensitive signaling pathways, cells sense and respond to physical stimuli from the surrounding environment, a process widely known as mechanotransduction. At the cell membrane, many signaling receptors, such as integrins, cadherins and T- or B-cell receptors, bind to their ligands on the surface of adjacent cells or the extracellular matrix (ECM) to mediate mechanotransduction. Upon ligation, these receptor-ligand bonds transmit piconewton (pN) mechanical forces that are generated, in part, by the cytoskeleton. Importantly, these forces expose cryptic sites within mechanosensitive proteins and modulate the binding kinetics (on/off rate) of receptor-ligand complexes to further fine-tune mechanotransduction and the corresponding cell behavior. Over the past three decades, two categories of methods have been developed to measure cell receptor forces. The first class is traction force microscopy (TFM) and micropost array detectors (mPADs). In these methods, cells are cultured on elastic polymers or microstructures that deform under mechanical forces. The second category of techniques is single molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) including atomic force microscopy (AFM), optical or magnetic tweezers, and biomembrane force probe (BFP). In SMFS, the experimenter applies external forces to probe the mechanics of individual cells or single receptor-ligand complexes, serially, one bond at a time. Although these techniques are powerful, the limited throughput of SMFS and the nN force sensitivity of TFM have hindered further elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction. In this Account, we introduce the recent advent of molecular tension fluorescence microscopy (MTFM) as an emerging tool for molecular imaging of receptor mechanics in living cells. MTFM probes are composed of an extendable linker, such as polymer, oligonucleotide, or protein, and flanked by a fluorophore and quencher. By measuring the fluorescence emission of immobilized MTFM probes, one can infer the extension of the linker and the externally applied force. Thus, MTFM combines aspects of TFM and SMFS to optically report receptor forces across the entire cell surface with pN sensitivity. Specifically, we provide an in-depth review of MTFM probe design, which includes the extendable "spring", spectroscopic ruler, surface immobilization chemistry, and ligand design strategies. We also demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of different versions of MTFM probes by discussing case studies involving the pN forces involved in epidermal growth factor receptor, integrin, and T-cell receptor signaling pathways. Lastly, we present a brief future outlook, primarily from a chemists' perspective, on the challenges and opportunities for the design of next generation MTFM probes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Mechanical unfolding of biomolecules.
Free energy landscape of a two-state model representative of a biomolecule adopting two states (A, B) separated by an energy barrier.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Schematic of current technologies to image cell forces.
(A) Scheme depicting traction force microscopy (TFM) and single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS). Adapted with permission from ref 19. Copyright (2016) Nature Publishing Group, and ref 20. Copyright (2003) Elsevier. (B) Simplified diagram that shows how tension probes report on cell forces.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Force-extension relation for different molecular force probes.
(A) Plot showing the force-extension relationship of biomolecules [blue: DNA duplex and titin immunoglobulin I27 domain (PDB ID: 1TIT)] used in MTFM; semiconductor tetrapod (red) and mechanophores (green). The dashed line corresponds to the mechanical work (product of force multiplied by deformation distance) that is equivalent to thermal energy (kBT, at room temperature). The stability of tension probes is greater than kBT and tuned to probe different processes. (B) Plot showing the expected force-extension curve for DNA hairpins of different GC contents at 25°C. The plots were generated using eq. 2 which describes the unfolding probabilities of DNA as a function of applied forces. (C) Theoretical plot showing the force responses of PEG linkers as a function of PEG length distance. The yellow region highlights the range of extensions that can be detected by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), while the blue region highlights the range of distances probed by nanometal surface energy transfer (NSET). (D) Plot showing the NSET quenching efficiency as a function of PEG extension with different energy transfer mechanisms (parenthesis indicates the radius of AuNP). Experimental data re-plotted from ref 39 (E) Plot comparing the fold increase of donor fluorescence as a function of tension applied to different probes.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. PEG-based MTFM Probes.
(A) Schematic of the PEG tension sensor, comprised of a PEG polymer flanked with a fluorescently labeled (Alexa Fluor 647) EGF ligand and a biotin moiety for surface immobilization (Top). When EGFR exerts a force on its ligand, the flexible PEG linker extends. The displacement of the EGF ligand results in an increase in the measured fluorescence intensity, thus reporting the transmission of mechanical tension through the EGF-EGFR complex (Middle). Representative brightfield, RICM and fluorescence response for a cell engaged to an EGF-PEG24 force sensor surface. The sensor fluorescence response was converted into a force map by using the extended WLC model (eq. 3) for PEG24 (Bottom) Adapted with the permission from ref 22. Copyright 2013 Nature publishing group. (B) Schematic showing the expected mechanism of how cell-generated forces activate the AuNP tension probe. Theoretical plot showing the change in fluorescence as a function of applied tension based on combining the WLC (eq. 3) and NSET models. The dynamic range of the probe corresponds to quenching efficiency values ranging from 90 to 10%. Representative TIRFM-488 (GFP channel, green) and Cy3B epifluorescence (integrin-tension channel, red) images of NIH/3T3 fibroblast cells cultured on randomly arranged AuNP sensor substrates for 1−2 h. The cells were transiently transfected to express GFP β3-integrin, paxillin, zyxin, and LifeAct, and this signal was found to colocalize with the integrin tension signal. Plot of GFP paxillin cluster size (which is indicative of FA size) as a function of time for n = 10 cells. The plots show the steady increase in FA size and tension over 5 h after cell seeding on the 50 nm-spaced substrate, which is in contrast to the 100 nm spaced substrate, which shows limited FA maturation. Adapted from ref 52. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. (C) Synthetic scheme for generating ligand-general MTFM Probes. RICM and fluorescence images showing the cell−substrate contact zone along with a map of integrin tension at 1h and 64 h. Adapted from ref 44. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
(A) Schematic of the DNA-based tension sensor, which is comprised of an anchor strand immobilized onto a surface (blue), a hairpin strand that unfolds under sufficient tension (black) and a ligand strand presenting an adhesive peptide (green). At the apposing termini of the ligand and anchoring strands, a fluorophore and quencher were coupled to report the force-induced unfolding of the hairpin (left). Table summarizes the calculated and measured F1/2 values, GC content and the calculated free energy of hybridization of all hairpins used (top right). Representative brightfield, RICM and tension (4.7 pN) images show the initial stage of cell spreading and adhesion (bottom right). Adapted with permission from ref 31. Copyright 2014 Nature publishing group. (B) Schematic of DNA-based AuNP sensor for mapping TCR-mediated tension. The fluorescence of the Cy3B dye (pink dot) is dequenched upon mechanical unfolding of the hairpin, which separates the dye from the black hole quencher 2 (BHQ2, block dot) and AuNP surface (left). Plot shows a 103 ± 8-fold increase in fluorescence on the opening of hairpins and AFM image shows the immobilized AuNP sensors on a glass coverslip (top right). Representative tension images of OT-1 cells cultured on tension probe surfaces modified with N4 pMHC show differential force response on 12 and 19 pN probes (middle right). Plot of pYZap70 levels in response to ligands with increasing potency under physical or chemical perturbations. The slope (m) indicates the T-cell specificity to different ligands (bottom right). Adapted with permission from ref 9. Copyright 2016 National Academy of Sciences, USA. (C) Table showing a list of DNA hairpin probes used for tension sensing.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
(A) Schematic showing a series of I27 based tension probes with different fluorescent reporters and ligands. (B) Schematic illustration of disulfide clamped I27 tension sensor. When cells apply tension to the clamped MTFM sensor, I27 is stretched to the position of the disulfide clamp, resulting in solvent exposure of the disulfide. I27 can be further mechanically extended only in the presence of reducing agent, such as DTT. (C) Representative RICM and clamped I27 tension signal for REF cells incubated onto the sensor surface for 2 h before and after treatment with 0.25 mM DTT for 10 min, and then after treatment with Y-27632 (40 μM) for 30 min. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Representative kinetic plots showing an increase in fluorescence tension signal at different DTT concentrations. Dashed lines represent single-exponential fits used to determine reduction rate. (E) Plot of the rate of disulfide reduction as a function of [DTT] for REF cells (blue), REF cells blocked with αvβ3 (red), and α5β1 antibodies (green). Adapted from ref 32. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asally M; Kittisopikul M; Rue P; Du Y; Hu Z; Cagatay T; Robinson AB; Lu H; Garcia-Ojalvo J; Suel GM Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 18891–18896. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mammoto T; Ingber DE Mechanical control of tissue and organ development. Development 2010, 137, 1407–1420. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Judokusumo E; Tabdanov E; Kumari S; Dustin ML; Kam LC Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys. J 2012, 102, L5–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brugues A; Anon E; Conte V; Veldhuis JH; Gupta M; Colombelli J; Munoz JJ; Brodland GW; Ladoux B; Trepat X Forces driving epithelial wound healing. Nat. Phys 2014, 10, 683–690. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McBeath R; Pirone DM; Nelson CM; Bhadriraju K; Chen CS Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 2004, 6, 483–495. - PubMed

Publication types