Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;143(12):1313-1345.
doi: 10.1037/bul0000123. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research

Carol Chu  1 , Jennifer M Buchman-Schmitt  1 , Ian H Stanley  1 , Melanie A Hom  1 , Raymond P Tucker  2 , Christopher R Hagan  1 , Megan L Rogers  1 , Matthew C Podlogar  1 , Bruno Chiurliza  1 , Fallon B Ringer  1 , Matthew S Michaels  1 , Connor H G Patros  3 , Thomas E Joiner  1
Affiliations
Review

The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research

Carol Chu et al. Psychol Bull. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Over the past decade, the interpersonal theory of suicide has contributed to substantial advances in the scientific and clinical understanding of suicide and related conditions. The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that suicidal desire emerges when individuals experience intractable feelings of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness and near-lethal or lethal suicidal behavior occurs in the presence of suicidal desire and capability for suicide. A growing number of studies have tested these posited pathways in various samples; however, these findings have yet to be evaluated meta-analytically. This paper aimed to (a) conduct a systematic review of the unpublished and published, peer-reviewed literature examining the relationship between interpersonal theory constructs and suicidal thoughts and behaviors, (b) conduct meta-analyses testing the interpersonal theory hypotheses, and (c) evaluate the influence of various moderators on these relationships. Four electronic bibliographic databases were searched through the end of March, 2016: PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Hypothesis-driven meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted using 122 distinct unpublished and published samples. Findings supported the interpersonal theory: the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness was significantly associated with suicidal ideation; and the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide was significantly related to a greater number of prior suicide attempts. However, effect sizes for these interactions were modest. Alternative configurations of theory variables were similarly useful for predicting suicide risk as theory-consistent pathways. We conclude with limitations and recommendations for the interpersonal theory as a framework for understanding the suicidal spectrum. (PsycINFO Database Record

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Causal pathways to lethal or near-lethal suicidal behavior from the perspective of the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide (Joiner, 2005; Van Orden et al., 2010) are depicted with solid lines; sample items are presented in italics. Pathways tested in the current meta-analysis are indicated with dotted lines. Suicide risk represents an amalgamation of both suicidal ideation and suicide attempts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart of screening process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot depicting the Fisher’s z effects for the interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness predicting suicidal ideation. The first author and publication date are listed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot depicting the Fisher’s z effects for the interaction between thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and capability for suicide predicting (continuous) suicide attempt history.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Plot of the interpersonal theory of suicide constructs predicting suicide attempt history (measured continuously). The interaction between thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness at low (1 standard deviation below the mean) and high (1 standard deviation above the mean) levels of capability for suicide are presented. The effects obtained from the interaction models (not full models) were used to construct this plot.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Anestis JC, Anestis MD, Rufino KA, Cramer RJ, Miller H, Khazem LR, Joiner TE. Understanding the relationship between suicidality and psychopathy: An examination of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior. Archives of Suicide Research. 2016:1–20. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1048399. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anestis MD, Bagge CL, Tull MT, Joiner TE. Clarifying the role of emotion dysregulation in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in an undergraduate sample. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2011a;45(5):603–611. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anestis MD, Green BA. The impact of varying levels of confidentiality on disclosure of suicidal thoughts in a sample of United States National Guard personnel. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2015a;71(10):1023–1030. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22198. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anestis MD, Joiner TE. Examining the role of emotion in suicidality: Negative urgency as an amplifier of the relationship between components of the interpersonal–psychological theory of suicidal behavior and lifetime number of suicide attempts. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011c;129(1):261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anestis MD, Khazem LR, Mohn RS, Green BA. Testing the main hypotheses of the interpersonal–psychological theory of suicidal behavior in a large diverse sample of United States military personnel. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2015b;60:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.03.006. - DOI - PubMed