TIcaGrEloR and Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for recovery of vascular function after successful chronic total occlusion recanalization (TIGER-BVS trial): Rationale and study design
- PMID: 28707316
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27196
TIcaGrEloR and Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation for recovery of vascular function after successful chronic total occlusion recanalization (TIGER-BVS trial): Rationale and study design
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the role of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in coronary blood flow normalization immediately after chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO) recanalization.
Background: Coronary vascular function of a CTO immediately after recanalization is demonstrated to be poor.
Methods: The TIGER BVS is a prospective, double-randomized, open-label, two parallel-group controlled clinical trial to evaluate efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in improving vascular function of coronary segment distal to CTO immediately after CTO recanalization. A total of 50 patients who receive CTO PCI will be randomized 1:1 to receive ticagrelor versus clopidogrel at least 3 days before the procedure. Immediately after CTO recanalization with Absorb BVS implantation, a specific study of vascular function under adenosine infusion will be performed. Patients will be therefore randomized 1:1 to receive angiographic follow-up with vascular function and optical coherence tomography analyses at 1- or 3-year follow-up. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with number NCT02211066.
Conclusions: The TIGER BVS trial will provide the first randomized comparison between ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in recovering vascular function in CTO patients. It will also provide important data on vascular restoration therapy of Absorb BVS in this scenario.
Keywords: antiplatelet therapy; bioabsorbable stent; coronary artery disease.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment in
-
Chronic total occlusion: Does anti-platelet choice impact outcomes?Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 1;91(1):7-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27456. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 29314641
Similar articles
-
Long-Term Vascular Function in CTO Recanalization: A Randomized Clinical Trial of Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr;37:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.129. Epub 2021 Jul 1. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022. PMID: 34238679 Clinical Trial.
-
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel for recovery of vascular function immediately after successful chronic coronary total occlusion recanalization: A randomized clinical trial.Am Heart J. 2018 Oct;204:205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Am Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30149889 Clinical Trial.
-
Design and Rationale for comParison Between ticagreLor and clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in Patients with Acute cOronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PLEIO) Trial.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Feb;11(1):42-49. doi: 10.1007/s12265-017-9783-8. Epub 2018 Jan 17. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018. PMID: 29344840 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: what have we learned from randomized-controlled clinical trials?Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Jan;28(1):77-89. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000414. Coron Artery Dis. 2017. PMID: 27561169 Review.
-
Scaffold Thrombosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With ABSORB Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.024. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016. PMID: 26762906 Review.
Cited by
-
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds-Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 7;8(12):2167. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122167. J Clin Med. 2019. PMID: 31817876 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous