Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date
- PMID: 28426621
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002046
Committee Opinion No 700: Methods for Estimating the Due Date
Abstract
Accurate dating of pregnancy is important to improve outcomes and is a research and public health imperative. As soon as data from the last menstrual period, the first accurate ultrasound examination, or both are obtained, the gestational age and the estimated due date (EDD) should be determined, discussed with the patient, and documented clearly in the medical record. Subsequent changes to the EDD should be reserved for rare circumstances, discussed with the patient, and documented clearly in the medical record. A pregnancy without an ultrasound examination that confirms or revises the EDD before 22 0/7 weeks of gestational age should be considered suboptimally dated. When determined from the methods outlined in this document for estimating the due date, gestational age at delivery represents the best obstetric estimate for the purpose of clinical care and should be recorded on the birth certificate. For the purposes of research and surveillance, the best obstetric estimate, rather than estimates based on the last menstrual period alone, should be used as the measure for gestational age.
Similar articles
-
Committee Opinion No. 700 Summary: Methods for Estimating the Due Date.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):967-968. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002042. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28426616
-
Committee Opinion No. 688: Management of Suboptimally Dated Pregnancies.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):e29-e32. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001949. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28225423
-
Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):863-866. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000454932.15177.be. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 25244460 Review.
-
The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;21 Suppl 2:86-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00865.x. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17803622 Review.
-
How well does fetal ultrasound predict the date of birth in Antigua and Barbuda?West Indian Med J. 2005 Mar;54(2):123-6. doi: 10.1590/s0043-31442005000200007. West Indian Med J. 2005. PMID: 15999882
Cited by
-
Intrapartum exposure to synthetic oxytocin, maternal BMI, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children within the ECHO consortium.J Neurodev Disord. 2024 May 26;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09540-1. J Neurodev Disord. 2024. PMID: 38796448 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal COVID-19 vaccination status and association with neonatal congenital anomalies.Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 19;12:1355502. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1355502. eCollection 2024. Front Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38706924 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of prenatal maternal depression on gestational length: post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 22;72:102601. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102601. eCollection 2024 Jun. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38680516 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Predicted 30-Year Risk of Maternal Cardiovascular Disease 2-7 Years After Delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun 1;143(6):775-784. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005569. Epub 2024 Apr 5. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38574364
-
Double true umbilical cord knots coexisting with a nuchal cord with successful fetal outcome: A case report.SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Mar 15;12:2050313X241239524. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241239524. eCollection 2024. SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38495733 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging workshop. Fetal Imaging Workshop Invited Participants. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:1070–82.
-
- Wegienka G, Baird DD. A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:248–52.
-
- Savitz DA, Terry JW Jr, Dole N, Thorp JM Jr, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1660–6.
-
- Barr WB, Pecci CC. Last menstrual period versus ultrasound for pregnancy dating. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:38–9.
-
- Bennett KA, Crane JM, O’Shea P, Lacelle J, Hutchens D, Copel JA. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1077–81.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials