Sensitivity analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis
- PMID: 28346822
- DOI: 10.1111/biom.12688
Sensitivity analysis for matched pair analysis of binary data: From worst case to average case analysis
Abstract
In matched observational studies where treatment assignment is not randomized, sensitivity analysis helps investigators determine how sensitive their estimated treatment effect is to some unmeasured confounder. The standard approach calibrates the sensitivity analysis according to the worst case bias in a pair. This approach will result in a conservative sensitivity analysis if the worst case bias does not hold in every pair. In this paper, we show that for binary data, the standard approach can be calibrated in terms of the average bias in a pair rather than worst case bias. When the worst case bias and average bias differ, the average bias interpretation results in a less conservative sensitivity analysis and more power. In many studies, the average case calibration may also carry a more natural interpretation than the worst case calibration and may also allow researchers to incorporate additional data to establish an empirical basis with which to calibrate a sensitivity analysis. We illustrate this with a study of the effects of cellphone use on the incidence of automobile accidents. Finally, we extend the average case calibration to the sensitivity analysis of confidence intervals for attributable effects.
Keywords: Attributable effects; Binary data; Causal inference; Cellphone; Majorization; Sensitivity analysis; Traffic collision.
© 2017, The International Biometric Society.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the effectiveness of empirical calibration under different bias scenarios.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01687-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022. PMID: 35896966 Free PMC article.
-
Calibrating sensitivity analyses to observed covariates in observational studies.Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):803-11. doi: 10.1111/biom.12101. Epub 2013 Nov 4. Biometrics. 2013. PMID: 24328711
-
Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Aug 1;46(4):1303-1311. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx023. Int J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28338913
-
[Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Jan;77(1):62-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1355405. Epub 2013 Nov 7. Gesundheitswesen. 2015. PMID: 24203687 Review. German.
-
Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:121-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.121. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000. PMID: 10884949 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources