Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr:161:94-108.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

Musical friends and foes: The social cognition of affiliation and control in improvised interactions

Affiliations

Musical friends and foes: The social cognition of affiliation and control in improvised interactions

Jean-Julien Aucouturier et al. Cognition. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

A recently emerging view in music cognition holds that music is not only social and participatory in its production, but also in its perception, i.e. that music is in fact perceived as the sonic trace of social relations between a group of real or virtual agents. While this view appears compatible with a number of intriguing music cognitive phenomena, such as the links between beat entrainment and prosocial behaviour or between strong musical emotions and empathy, direct evidence is lacking that listeners are at all able to use the acoustic features of a musical interaction to infer the affiliatory or controlling nature of an underlying social intention. We created a novel experimental situation in which we asked expert music improvisers to communicate 5 types of non-musical social intentions, such as being domineering, disdainful or conciliatory, to one another solely using musical interaction. Using a combination of decoding studies, computational and psychoacoustical analyses, we show that both musically-trained and non musically-trained listeners can recognize relational intentions encoded in music, and that this social cognitive ability relies, to a sizeable extent, on the information processing of acoustic cues of temporal and harmonic coordination that are not present in any one of the musicians' channels, but emerge from the dynamics of their interaction. By manipulating these cues in two-channel audio recordings and testing their impact on the social judgements of non-musician observers, we finally establish a causal relationship between the affiliation dimension of social behaviour and musical harmonic coordination on the one hand, and between the control dimension and musical temporal coordination on the other hand. These results provide novel mechanistic insights not only into the social cognition of musical interactions, but also into that of non-verbal interactions as a whole.

Keywords: Coordination; Interaction; Joint action; Musical improvisation; Social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(Study 2) Decoding performance (hit rates) by musician and non-musician listeners for the task of recognizing 5 types of relational intentions conveyed by musician A to musician B. In the stereo condition, participants could listen to the simultaneous recording of both musicians. In the mono condition, participants only listened to musician A. Reported hit rates were calculated as ratios of the total number of trials in each condition. Hypothesis tests of difference between samples were conducted on the corresponding unbiased hit rates, with indicating significance at the p < .05 level. Abbreviations: CAR: caring; CON: conciliatory; DIS: disdainful; DOM: domineering; INS: insolent; music.: musicians; non: non-musicians.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(Study 3) Acoustical analysis of proportion of simultaneous playing time. In prototypical disdainful interactions, encoders stopped playing during the decoder’s interventions to suggest active avoidance (a). Simultaneous play was maximum in caring (i.e., supporting) and domineering (i.e., monopolizing) interactions (b). Abbreviations: CAR: caring; CON: conciliatory; DIS: disdainful; DOM: domineering; INS: insolent.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(Study 3) Acoustical analysis of Granger causality. In prototypical domineering interactions, sound energy in the encoder’s channel was the Granger-cause for the energy in the decoder’s channel (a). Decoder-to-encoder causalities were maximum in caring interactions, while practically absent from insolent or disdainful interactions (b). Abbreviations: CAR: caring; CON: conciliatory; DIS: disdainful; DOM: domineering; INS: insolent.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(Study 4) Psychoacoustical analysis of harmonic coordination. In prototypical conciliatory interactions, encoders initiated motions from independent (e.g., maintaining a dissonant minor second G#-A interval) to complementary (e.g., gradually increasing G# to a maximally consonant unison on A) simultaneous play with the decoder (a). Strongly mirroring simultaneous play was never used in domineering, insolent and disdainful interactions (b). Abbreviations: CAR: caring; CON: conciliatory; DIS: disdainful; DOM: domineering; INS: insolent.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(Study 5) Affiliation and control judgements of the attitude of musician A with respect to musician B, before (“original”) and after (“manipulated”) three types of acoustic manipulations: decrease harmonic coordination (detuned musician A, AFF- condition), increased encoder-to-decoder causality (musician A shifted ahead, CTL+ condition), decreased encoder-to-decoder causality (musician A shifted behind, CTL− condition). Conditions enframed in dark lines correspond to predicted differences (e.g., AFF- on affiliation), and others to predicted nulls (e.g., AFF- on control). Hypothesis tests of paired difference with uncorrected t-tests, indicating significance at the p < .05 level, error bars represent 95% CI on the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alluri V., Toiviainen P., Jääskeläinen I.P., Glerean E., Sams M., Brattico E. Large-scale brain networks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3677–3689. - PubMed
    1. Anshel A., Kipper D.A. The influence of group singing on trust and cooperation. Journal of Music Therapy. 1988;25(3):145–155.
    1. Badino L., D’Ausilio A., Glowinski D., Camurri A., Fadiga L. Sensorimotor communication in professional quartets. Neuropsychologia. 2014;55:98–104. - PubMed
    1. Bailey D. Da Capo Press; New York: 1992. Improvisation. Its nature and practice in music.
    1. Bente G., Leuschner H., Al Issa A., Blascovich J.J. The others: Universals and cultural specificities in the perception of status and dominance from nonverbal behavior. Consciousness and Cognition. 2010;19(3):762–777. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources