Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016
- PMID: 28101605
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016
Abstract
Objective: To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012".
Design: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.
Methods: The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.
Results: The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.
Conclusions: Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.
Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria; Guidelines; Infection; Sepsis; Sepsis bundles; Sepsis syndrome; Septic shock; Surviving Sepsis Campaign.
Comment in
-
New Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines: back to the art of medicine.Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 11;52(1):1701818. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01818-2017. Print 2018 Jul. Eur Respir J. 2018. PMID: 29997181 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28098591
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32032273
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23361625 Free PMC article.
-
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23353941
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18158437
Cited by
-
Opportunities to Enhance Diagnostic Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Multinational Survey of Healthcare Professionals.Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Jul;13(7):1621-1637. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-00996-1. Epub 2024 Jun 3. Infect Dis Ther. 2024. PMID: 38829440 Free PMC article.
-
Towards personalized medicine: a scoping review of immunotherapy in sepsis.Crit Care. 2024 May 28;28(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04964-6. Crit Care. 2024. PMID: 38807151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A multisite validation of a two hours antibiotic susceptibility flow cytometry assay directly from positive blood cultures.BMC Microbiol. 2024 May 28;24(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03341-1. BMC Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 38802760 Free PMC article.
-
Suppression PCR-Based Selective Enrichment Sequencing for Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Detection on Cell-Free DNA in Sepsis-A Targeted, Blood Culture-Independent Approach for Rapid Pathogen and Resistance Diagnostics in Septic Patients.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 17;25(10):5463. doi: 10.3390/ijms25105463. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38791501 Free PMC article.
-
Survey of Thai Physicians' Practice in Pediatric Septic Shock.Children (Basel). 2024 May 15;11(5):597. doi: 10.3390/children11050597. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38790592 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical