Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6.
doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0225-2.

Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013

Affiliations
Review

Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013

Vitaly A Kushnir et al. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. .

Abstract

Background: Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has undergone considerable changes over the last decade, with consequences on ART outcomes in different regions of the world being unknown.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of published national and regional ART registry data to assess how changes in clinical practice between 2004 and 2013 have impacted outcomes in Australia and New Zealand, Canada, Continental Europe, the United Kingdom (U.K.), Japan, Latin America, and the United States (U.S.). The data reflect 7,079,145 total ART cycles utilizing both fresh and previously cryopreserved embryos from autologous oocytes that resulted in 1,454,724 live births. This review focused on the following measures: ART cycle volume, use of cryopreserved embryos, single embryo transfer (SET), live birth rates in fresh and frozen-thawed cycles, and perinatal outcomes in recent years.

Results: SETs and utilization of frozen-thawed embryos increased worldwide over the study period. In 2012 SET utilization in all ART cycles was highest in Japan and Australia/New Zealand (82.6% and 76.3% respectively) and lowest in Latin America (16.0%). While gradual improvements in live birth rates were observed in most regions, some demonstrated declines. By 2012-2013, fresh cycle live birth rates were highest in the U.S. (29%) and lowest in Japan (5%). In Japan, the observed decline in fresh cycle live birth rate coincided with transition to minimal stimulation protocols, transfer of frozen-thawed rather than fresh embryos, and implementation of an SET policy. Similarly, implementation of an SET policy in parts of Canada was followed by a decline in fresh cycle live birth rate. Increasing live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo cycles, seen all over the world, partially compensated for declines in fresh ART cycles. During 2012-2013 Australia/New Zealand and Japan reported the lowest multiple delivery rates of 5.6 and 4% respectively while the US had the highest of 27%. In recent years, preterm delivery rates in all regions ranged between 9.0 to 16.6% for singletons, 53.9 to 67.3% for twins, and 91.4 to 100% for triplets and higher order multiples. Inconsistencies in the way perinatal outcome data are presented by various registries, made comparison between regions difficult.

Conclusions: ART practices are characterized by outcome differences between regions. International consensus on the definition of ART success, which accounts for perinatal outcomes, may help to standardize worldwide ART practice and improve outcomes.

Trial registration: PROSPERO ( CRD42016033011 ).

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Embryo cryopreservation; In vitro fertilization; Live birth rates; Single embryo transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Total volume of autologous oocyte ART cycles for study period 2004–2013. The figure demonstrates gradually increasing ART cycle number in most regions, except for Japan, which demonstrates a rapid increase in cycle number. European cycle volume fluctuated depending on number of reporting countries in that region each year. b Proportion of ART cycles which utilized frozen-thawed embryos created from autologous oocytes. The figure demonstrates that utilization of previously cryopreserved embryos has increased in all regions except Australia/New Zealand
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proportion of autologous fresh embryo cycles in which SET was used. The figure demonstrates increasing utilization of SET in all studied regions
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a ART live birth rates with fresh embryos created from autologous oocytes. The figure demonstrates stable or slightly decreasing live birth rates in most regions. Increasing live birth rates are noted in continental Europe while most pronounced decreases are noted in Japan and in Canada after 2009. b ART live birth rates with frozen-thawed embryos created from autologous oocytes. The figure demonstrates improving live birth rates in frozen-thawed cycles in all regions. Data is reported per initiated cycles for all regions except Latin America which reports data per embryo transfer and Europe which reports data per thawing procedure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams RS, Doody KJ, Schattman GL, Adashi EY. Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology outcomes: past, present, and future. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kushnir VA, Vidali A, Barad DH, Gleicher N. The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):736–741. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C, Bardach A. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;7:CD002118. - PubMed
    1. Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Solà I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG. Comprehensive chromosome screening of trophectoderm with vitrification facilitates elective single-embryo transfer for infertile women with advanced maternal age. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):615–619. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1972. - DOI - PubMed