The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration
- PMID: 27509748
- DOI: 10.1890/15-1077
The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration
Abstract
Land-use change in the coastal zone has led to worldwide degradation of marine coastal ecosystems and a loss of the goods and services they provide. Restoration is the process of assisting the recovery of an ecosystem that has been degraded, damaged, or destroyed and is critical for habitats where natural recovery is hindered. Uncertainties about restoration cost and feasibility can impede decisions on whether, what, how, where, and how much to restore. Here, we perform a synthesis of 235 studies with 954 observations from restoration or rehabilitation projects of coral reefs, seagrass, mangroves, salt-marshes, and oyster reefs worldwide, and evaluate cost, survival of restored organisms, project duration, area, and techniques applied. Findings showed that while the median and average reported costs for restoration of one hectare of marine coastal habitat were around US$80000 (2010) and US$1600000 (2010), respectively, the real total costs (median) are likely to be two to four times higher. Coral reefs and seagrass were among the most expensive ecosystems to restore. Mangrove restoration projects were typically the largest and the least expensive per hectare. Most marine coastal restoration projects were conducted in Australia, Europe, and USA, while total restoration costs were significantly (up to 30 times) cheaper in countries with developing economies. Community- or volunteer-based marine restoration projects usually have lower costs. Median survival of restored marine and coastal organisms, often assessed only within the first one to two years after restoration, was highest for saltmarshes (64.8%) and coral reefs (64.5%) and lowest for seagrass (38.0%). However, success rates reported in the scientific literature could be biased towards publishing successes rather than failures. The majority of restoration projects were short-lived and seldom reported monitoring costs. Restoration success depended primarily on the ecosystem, site selection, and techniques applied rather than on money spent. We need enhanced investment in both improving restoration practices and large-scale restoration.
Comment in
-
Rebutting the inclined analyses on the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of coral reef restoration.Ecol Appl. 2017 Sep;27(6):1970-1973. doi: 10.1002/eap.1559. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Ecol Appl. 2017. PMID: 28418173 No abstract available.
-
Response to "Rebutting the inclined analyses on the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of coral reef restoration".Ecol Appl. 2017 Sep;27(6):1974-1980. doi: 10.1002/eap.1583. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Ecol Appl. 2017. PMID: 28618118 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Spatial cost-benefit analysis of blue restoration and factors driving net benefits globally.Conserv Biol. 2021 Dec;35(6):1850-1860. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13742. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Conserv Biol. 2021. PMID: 33818808
-
The Effectiveness, Costs and Coastal Protection Benefits of Natural and Nature-Based Defences.PLoS One. 2016 May 2;11(5):e0154735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154735. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27135247 Free PMC article.
-
Coral reef restoration efforts in Latin American countries and territories.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 5;15(8):e0228477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228477. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32756569 Free PMC article.
-
From grey to green: Efficacy of eco-engineering solutions for nature-based coastal defence.Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):1827-1842. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14063. Epub 2018 Feb 16. Glob Chang Biol. 2018. PMID: 29350842 Review.
-
Bright Spots in Coastal Marine Ecosystem Restoration.Curr Biol. 2020 Dec 21;30(24):R1500-R1510. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.056. Curr Biol. 2020. PMID: 33352137 Review.
Cited by
-
A global meta-analysis on the drivers of salt marsh planting success and implications for ecosystem services.Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 29;15(1):3643. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47769-5. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38684646 Free PMC article.
-
Protecting Great Barrier Reef resilience through effective management of crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks.PLoS One. 2024 Apr 24;19(4):e0298073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298073. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38656948 Free PMC article.
-
The Global Biodiversity Framework's ecosystem restoration target requires more clarity and careful legal interpretation.Nat Ecol Evol. 2024 May;8(5):840-841. doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02389-6. Nat Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38519632 No abstract available.
-
The value of marsh restoration for flood risk reduction in an urban estuary.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 21;14(1):6856. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57474-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38514760 Free PMC article.
-
Including environmental and climatic considerations for sustainable coral reef restoration.PLoS Biol. 2024 Mar 19;22(3):e3002542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002542. eCollection 2024 Mar. PLoS Biol. 2024. PMID: 38502663 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources