Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Nov;37(11):4197-4211.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.23300.

The imaginative mind

Anna Abraham  1
Affiliations
Review

The imaginative mind

Anna Abraham. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Nov.

Abstract

The astounding capacity for the human imagination to be engaged across a wide range of contexts is limitless and fundamental to our day-to-day experiences. Although processes of imagination are central to human psychological function, they rarely occupy center stage in academic discourse or empirical study within psychological and neuroscientific realms. The aim of this paper is to tackle this imbalance by drawing together the multitudinous facets of imagination within a common framework. The processes fall into one of five categories depending on whether they are characterized as involving perceptual/motor related mental imagery, intentionality or recollective processing, novel combinatorial or generative processing, exceptional phenomenology in the aesthetic response, or altered psychological states which range from commonplace to dysfunctional. These proposed categories are defined on the basis of theoretical ideas from philosophy as well as empirical evidence from neuroscience. By synthesizing the findings across these domains of imagination, this novel five-part or quinquepartite classification of the human imagination aids in systematizing, and thereby abets, our understanding of the workings and neural foundations of the human imagination. It would serve as a blueprint to direct further advances in the field of imagination while also promoting crosstalk with reference to stimulus-oriented facets of information processing. A biologically and ecologically valid psychology is one that seeks to explain fundamental aspects of human nature. Given the ubiquitous nature of the imaginative operations in our daily lives, there can be little doubt that these quintessential aspects of the mind should be central to the discussion. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4197-4211, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords: aesthetics; brain networks; creativity; imagery; imagination; intentionality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A schematic diagram of the five‐part or quinquepartite classification of operations relevant to the human imagination that have been categorized on the basis of similarities in their underlying putative neurocognitive mechanisms.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A generalized summary of the neurocognitive basis of each of the five categories of imagination.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abraham A (2014): Creative thinking as orchestrated by semantic processing vs. cognitive control brain networks. Front Human Neurosci 8:95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abraham A, Bubic A (2015): Semantic memory as the root of imagination. Cogn Sci 6:325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abraham A, Windmann S (2007): Creative cognition: The diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Methods (San Diego, Calif.) 42:38–48. - PubMed
    1. Abraham A, Schubotz RI, von Cramon DY (2008a): Thinking about the future versus the past in personal and non‐personal contexts. Brain Res 1233:106–119. - PubMed
    1. Abraham A, von Cramon DY, Schubotz RI (2008b): Meeting George Bush versus meeting Cinderella: The neural response when telling apart what is real from what is fictional in the context of our reality. J Cogn Neurosci 20:965–976. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources