Follow your nose: Implicit spatial processing within the chemosensory systems
- PMID: 27386733
- DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000261
Follow your nose: Implicit spatial processing within the chemosensory systems
Abstract
Although most studies agree that humans cannot smell in stereo, it was recently suggested that olfactory localization is possible when assessed implicitly. In a spatial cueing paradigm, lateralized olfactory cues impaired the detection of congruently presented visual targets, an effect contrary to the typical facilitation observed in other sensory domains. Here, we examined the specificity and the robustness of this finding by studying implicit localization abilities in another chemosensory system and by accounting for possible confounds in a modified paradigm. Sixty participants completed a spatial cueing task along with an explicit localization task, using trigeminal (Experiment 1) and olfactory (Experiment 2) stimuli. A control task was implemented to control for residual somatosensory stimulation (Experiment 3). In the trigeminal experiment, stimuli were localized with high accuracy on the explicit level, while the cueing effect in form of facilitation was limited to response accuracy. In the olfactory experiment, responses were slowed by congruent cues on the implicit level, while no explicit localization was observed. Our results point to the robustness of the olfactory interference effect, corroborating the implicit-explicit dissociation of olfactory localization, and challenging the view that humans lost the ability to extract spatial information from smell. The absence of a similar interference for trigeminal cues suggests distinct implicit spatial processing mechanisms within the chemosensory systems. Moreover, the lack of a typical facilitation effect in the trigeminal domain points to important differences from spatial information processing in other, nonchemosensory domains. The possible mechanisms driving the effects are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Assessing implicit odor localization in humans using a cross-modal spatial cueing paradigm.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029614. Epub 2011 Dec 27. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22216331 Free PMC article.
-
Localisation of unilateral nasal stimuli across sensory systems.Neurosci Lett. 2010 Jul 5;478(2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.04.074. Epub 2010 May 6. Neurosci Lett. 2010. PMID: 20451578
-
Trigeminal perception is necessary to localize odors.Physiol Behav. 2009 Jun 22;97(3-4):401-5. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Mar 20. Physiol Behav. 2009. PMID: 19303891 Clinical Trial.
-
Engineering Aspects of Olfaction.In: Persaud KC, Marco S, Gutiérrez-Gálvez A, editors. Neuromorphic Olfaction. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2013. Chapter 1. In: Persaud KC, Marco S, Gutiérrez-Gálvez A, editors. Neuromorphic Olfaction. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2013. Chapter 1. PMID: 26042329 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Performance of a Computational Model of the Mammalian Olfactory System.In: Persaud KC, Marco S, Gutiérrez-Gálvez A, editors. Neuromorphic Olfaction. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2013. Chapter 6. In: Persaud KC, Marco S, Gutiérrez-Gálvez A, editors. Neuromorphic Olfaction. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2013. Chapter 6. PMID: 26042330 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Implicit versus explicit processing of visual, olfactory, and multimodal landmark information in human wayfinding.Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1285034. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285034. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 38034279 Free PMC article.
-
Exogenous capture of visual spatial attention by olfactory-trigeminal stimuli.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252943. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34111171 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources