Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 26:7:769.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769. eCollection 2016.

Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements

Italo Trizano-Hermosilla  1 , Jesús M Alvarado  2
Affiliations

Best Alternatives to Cronbach's Alpha Reliability in Realistic Conditions: Congeneric and Asymmetrical Measurements

Italo Trizano-Hermosilla et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The Cronbach's alpha is the most widely used method for estimating internal consistency reliability. This procedure has proved very resistant to the passage of time, even if its limitations are well documented and although there are better options as omega coefficient or the different versions of glb, with obvious advantages especially for applied research in which the ítems differ in quality or have skewed distributions. In this paper, using Monte Carlo simulation, the performance of these reliability coefficients under a one-dimensional model is evaluated in terms of skewness and no tau-equivalence. The results show that omega coefficient is always better choice than alpha and in the presence of skew items is preferable to use omega and glb coefficients even in small samples.

Keywords: alpha; asymmetrical measures; greatest lower bound; omega; reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Al-Homidan S. (2008). Semidefinite programming for the educational testing problem. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 16, 239–249. 10.1007/s10100-008-0056-0 - DOI
    1. Bernaards C., Jennrich R. (2015). Package “GPArotation.” Available online at: http://ftp.daum.net/CRAN/web/packages/GPArotation/GPArotation.pdf
    1. Cho E., Kim S. (2015). Cronbach's coefficient alpha: well known but poorly understood. Organ. Res. Methods 18, 207–230. 10.1177/1094428114555994 - DOI
    1. Cortina J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. Appl. Psychol. 78, 98–104. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 - DOI
    1. Cronbach L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334. 10.1007/BF02310555 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources