Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0138348.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138348. eCollection 2015.

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of MVA Smallpox Vaccine (IMVAMUNE) in 18-40 Year Old Subjects with Diagnosed Atopic Dermatitis

Richard N Greenberg  1 , Maria Yadira Hurley, Dinh V Dinh  2 , Serena Mraz  3 , Javier Gomez Vera  4 , Dorothea von Bredow  5 , Alfred von Krempelhuber  5 , Siegfried Roesch  5 , Garth Virgin  5 , Nathaly Arndtz-Wiedemann  5 , Thomas Peter Meyer  5 , Darja Schmidt  5 , Richard Nichols  5 , Philip Young  5 , Paul Chaplin  5
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Multicenter, Open-Label, Controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of MVA Smallpox Vaccine (IMVAMUNE) in 18-40 Year Old Subjects with Diagnosed Atopic Dermatitis

Richard N Greenberg et al. PLoS One. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Replicating smallpox vaccines can cause severe complications in individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD). Prior studies evaluating Modified Vaccinia Ankara virus (MVA), a non-replicating vaccine in humans, showed a favorable safety and immunogenicity profile in healthy volunteers.

Objective: This Phase II study compared the safety and immunogenicity of MVA enrolling groups of 350 subjects with AD (SCORAD ≤ 30) and 282 healthy subjects.

Methods: Subjects were vaccinated twice with MVA, each dose given subcutaneously 4 weeks apart. Adverse events, cardiac parameters, and the development of vaccinia virus humoral immune responses were monitored.

Results: The overall safety of the vaccine was similar in both groups. Adverse events affecting skin were experienced significantly more often in subjects with AD, but the majority of these events were mild to moderate in intensity. Seroconversion rates and geometric mean titers for total and neutralizing vaccinia-specific antibodies in the AD group were non-inferior compared to the healthy subjects.

Limitations: The size of the study population limited the detection of serious adverse events occurring at a frequency less than 1%.

Conclusion: MVA has a favorable safety profile and the ability to elicit vaccinia-specific immune responses in subjects with AD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00316602.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: This study was funded by Bavarian Nordic through NIAID contract #N01-AI-40072. Rx Clinical Research, Inc. received grants from Bavarian Nordic. DVD is employed by Rx Clinical Research, Inc.. DB, AK, RS, GV, NA, TM, DS, RN, PY and PC were employed by Bavarian Nordic at the time of this study. The current employment is found on the title page of the submission. PC is holding patents in relation to MVA-BN (Modified Vaccina Ankara Virus Variant, International Publication Number WO 02/42480 A2). Additional MVA-BN patents based on this patent and other MVA patents are listed in a Supporting Information file. There are no further patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Disposition of subjects.
AD = atopic dermatitis; n = number of subjects in the specified category; FAS = full analysis set; PPS = per-protocol analysis set. a: There was one subject that did not receive the second vaccination but did not terminate the study prematurely, i.e. returned for the final visit. b: more than one reason per subject possible. c: 10 subjects with currently active AD had a SCORAD >30 at screening; 2 of these subjects had a SCORAD >39 and were excluded from PPS as major protocol violations. For the volunteers that were excluded from the PPS but had samples available, immunogenicity results were similar to those of the PPS subjects.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Seroconversion.
Seroconversion rates were determined by vaccinia-specific ELISA (A) and PRNT (B). Data set is FAS (full analysis set), N = 632 (for Week 32 N = 235). Error bars represent upper and lower confidence intervals. Vaccinations were given at Week 0 and Week 4. AD = atopic dermatitis.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Antibody Titers.
Geometric mean titers determined by vaccinia-specific ELISA (A) or PRNT (B). Data set is FAS (full analysis set), N = 632 (for Week 32 N = 235). Error bars represent upper and lower confidence intervals. Vaccinations were given at Week 0 and Week 4. AD = atopic dermatitis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Henderson DA. Smallpox: Clinical and epidemiologic features. Emerg Infect Dis 1999. July;5(4):537–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Artenstein AW, Grabenstein JD. Smallpox vaccines for biodefense: need and feasibility. Expert Rev Vaccines 2008. October;7(8):1225–37. 10.1586/14760584.7.8.1225 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein JA, Neff JM, Lane JM, Koplan JP. Smallpox vaccination reactions, prophylaxis, and therapy of complications. Pediatrics 1975. March;55(3):342–7. - PubMed
    1. Lane JM, Frederick L, Ruben FL, Neff JM, Millar JD . Complications of smallpox vaccination, 1968. N Engl J Med 1969. November 27;281(22):1201–8. - PubMed
    1. Lane JM, Frederick L, Ruben FL, Neff JM, Millar JD. Complications of smallpox vaccination, 1968: Results of ten statewide surveys. J Infect Dis 1970. October;122(4):303–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data