Lumbar spine surgery positioning complications: a systematic review
- PMID: 26424340
- DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15268
Lumbar spine surgery positioning complications: a systematic review
Abstract
OBJECT There are a variety of surgical positions that provide optimal exposure of the dorsal lumbar spine. These include the prone, kneeling, knee-chest, knee-elbow, and lateral decubitus positions. All are positions that facilitate exposure of the spine. Each position, however, is associated with an array of unique complications that result from excessive pressure applied to the torso or extremities. The authors reviewed clinical studies reporting complications that arose from positioning of the patient during dorsal exposures of the lumbar spine. METHODS MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science database searches were performed to find clinical studies reporting complications associated with positioning during lumbar spine surgery. For articles meeting inclusion criteria, the following information was obtained: publication year, study design, sample size, age, operative time, type of surgery, surgical position, frame or table type, complications associated with positioning, time to first observed complication, long-term outcomes, and evidence-based recommendations for complication avoidance. RESULTS Of 3898 articles retrieved from MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, 34 met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four studies reported complications associated with use of the prone position, and 7 studies investigated complications after knee-chest positioning. Complications associated with the knee-elbow, lateral decubitus, and supine positions were each reported by a single study. Vision loss was the most commonly reported complication for both prone and knee-chest positioning. Several other complications were reported, including conjunctival swelling, Ischemic orbital compartment syndrome, nerve palsies, thromboembolic complications, pressure sores, lower extremity compartment syndrome, and shoulder dislocation, highlighting the assortment of possible complications following different surgical positions. For prone-position studies, there was a relationship between increased operation time and position complications. Only 3 prone-position studies reported complications following procedures of less than 120 minutes, 7 studies reported complications following mean operative times of 121-240 minutes, and 9 additional studies reported complications following mean operative times greater than 240 minutes. This relationship was not observed for knee-chest and other surgical positions. CONCLUSIONS This work presents a systematic review of positioning-related complications following prone, knee-chest, and other positions used for lumbar spine surgery. Numerous evidence-based recommendations for avoidance of these potentially severe complications associated with intraoperative positioning are discussed. This investigation may serve as a framework to educate the surgical team and decrease rates of intraoperative positioning complications.
Keywords: ASIS = anterior superior iliac spine; DVT = deep vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism; PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; knee-chest; lumbar spine surgery; positioning complications; prone; systematic review.
Similar articles
-
Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning.Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 30. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19482515
-
Lumbar microdiscectomy with spinal anesthesia: comparison of prone and knee-chest positions in means of hemodynamic and respiratory function.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):1176-84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181be5866. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010. PMID: 20173678 Clinical Trial.
-
Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Nov 15;13(4):e22.00022. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00022. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023. PMID: 38357472 Free PMC article.
-
Postoperative Visual Loss Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors by Diagnosis.World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):2010-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Sep 1. World Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26341434 Review.
-
Lumbar microdiscectomy complication rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E6. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15281. Neurosurg Focus. 2015. PMID: 26424346 Review.
Cited by
-
The Optimal Patient Position on the Surgical Table for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Study.Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Oct 13;8(2):180-187. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2023-0146. eCollection 2024 Mar 27. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 38618217 Free PMC article.
-
Delayed Emergence from Total Intravenous Anesthesia Following Posterior Spinal Correction and Fusion for Scoliosis: A Case Report.Am J Case Rep. 2024 Jan 9;25:e941563. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.941563. Am J Case Rep. 2024. PMID: 38192096 Free PMC article.
-
The Challenges of Spinal Surgery Requiring Ventral Decubitus in the Critical Trauma Patient on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Report.Cureus. 2023 Sep 25;15(9):e45904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45904. eCollection 2023 Sep. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37885529 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior To Psoas lumbar and lumbosacral combined with posterior reconstruction in Adult Spinal Deformity: A bicentric European study.Brain Spine. 2023 Feb 3;3:101718. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101718. eCollection 2023. Brain Spine. 2023. PMID: 37383431 Free PMC article.
-
The ideal patient positioning in spine surgery: a preventive strategy.EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Feb 21;8(2):63-72. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0135. EFORT Open Rev. 2023. PMID: 36805330 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous