Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug 26;2015(8):CD007449.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449.pub2.

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension

Affiliations
Review

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of dual alpha and beta blockers for primary hypertension

Gavin W K Wong et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Drugs with combined alpha and beta blocking activity are commonly prescribed to treat hypertension. However, the blood pressure (BP) lowering efficacy of this class of beta blockers has not been systematically reviewed and quantified.

Objectives: To quantify the dose-related effects of various types of dual alpha and beta adrenergic receptor blockers (dual receptor blockers) on systolic and diastolic blood pressure versus placebo in patients with primary hypertension.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Hypertension Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials up to October 2014. The WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) is searched for inclusion in the Group's Specialised Register.

Selection criteria: Randomized double blind placebo controlled parallel or cross-over trials. Studies contained a beta blocker monotherapy arm with a fixed dose. Patients enrolled in the studies had primary hypertension at baseline. Duration of the studies was from three to 12 weeks. Drugs in this class of beta blockers are carvedilol, dilevalol and labetalol.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors (GW and AL) confirmed the inclusion of studies and extracted the data independently. RevMan 5.3 was used to synthesize data.

Main results: We included eight studies examining the blood pressure lowering efficacy of carvedilol and labetalol in 1493 hypertensive patients. Five of the included studies were parallel design; three were cross-over design. The two largest included studies were unpublished carvedilol studies. The estimates of BP lowering effect (systolic BP/diastolic BP millimeters of mercury; SPB/DBP mm Hg) were -4 mm Hg (95% confidence intervals (CI) -6 to -2)/-3 mm Hg (95% CI -4 to -2) for carvedilol (>1000 subjects) and -10 mm Hg (95% CI -14 to -7)/-7 mm Hg (95% CI -9 to -5) for labetalol (110 subjects). The effect of labetalol is likely to be exaggerated due to high risk of bias. Carvedilol, within the recommended dose range, did not show a significant dose response effect for SBP or DBP. Carvedilol had little or no effect on pulse pressure (-1 mm Hg) and did not change BP variability. Overall, once and twice the starting dose of carvedilol and labetalol lowered BP by -6 mm Hg (95% CI -7 to -4) /-4 mm Hg (95% CI -4 to -3) (low quality evidence) and lowered heart rate by five beats per minute (95% CI -6 to -4) (low quality evidence). Five studies (N = 1412) reported withdrawal due to adverse effects; the risk ratio was 0.88 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.42) (moderate quality evidence).

Authors' conclusions: This review provides low quality evidence that in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, dual receptor blockers lowered trough BP by an average of -6/-4 mm Hg and reduced heart rate by five beats per minute. Due to the larger sample size from the two unpublished studies, carvedilol provided a better estimate of BP lowering effect than labetalol. The BP lowering estimate from combining carvedilol once and twice the starting doses is -4/-3 mm Hg. Doses higher than the recommended starting dose did not provide additional BP reduction. Higher doses of dual receptor blockers caused more bradycardia than lower doses. Based on indirect comparison with other classes of drugs, the blood pressure lowering effect of dual alpha- and beta-receptor blockers is less than non-selective, beta1 selective and partial agonist beta blockers, as well as thiazides and drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system. Dual blockers also had little or no effect on reducing pulse pressure, which is similar to the other beta-blocker classes, but less than the average reduction of pulse pressure seen with thiazides and drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system. Patients taking dual receptor blockers were not more likely to withdraw from the study compared to patients taking placebo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Gavin Wong: Nothing to declare.

Alexandra Laugerrotte: Nothing to declare.

James M Wright: Nothing to declare.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Carvedilol vs placebo, Outcome 1 systolic blood pressure.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Carvedilol vs placebo, Outcome 2 diastolic blood pressure.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Carvedilol vs placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Carvedilol vs placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Labetalol vs placebo, Outcome 1 systolic blood pressure.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Labetalol vs placebo, Outcome 2 diastolic blood pressure.
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 Labetalol vs placebo, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 Labetalol vs placebo, Outcome 4 Pulse pressure.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Pooled overall effects, Outcome 1 systolic blood pressure.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Pooled overall effects, Outcome 2 diastolic blood pressure.
3.3
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3 Pooled overall effects, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
3.4
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3 Pooled overall effects, Outcome 4 Pulse Pressure.
3.5
3.5. Analysis
Comparison 3 Pooled overall effects, Outcome 5 withdrawal due to adverse effects.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Adjusted combined once and twice starting dose effects, Outcome 1 systolic blood pressure.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Adjusted combined once and twice starting dose effects, Outcome 2 diastolic blood pressure.
4.3
4.3. Analysis
Comparison 4 Adjusted combined once and twice starting dose effects, Outcome 3 Heart rate.
4.4
4.4. Analysis
Comparison 4 Adjusted combined once and twice starting dose effects, Outcome 4 Pulse Pressure.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007449

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Carvedilol GSK B100 {unpublished data only}
    1. GlaxoSmithKline. A multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled comparison of Carvedilol (SK&F) 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, and 25.0 mg administered twice daily in patients with mild and moderate hypertension.. http://www.gsk‐clinicalstudyregister.com/result_detail.jsp?protocolId=105517%2F021&stud... (accessed ‐ day month year) updated 13 September 2005. [GSK protocol ID 105517/021; GSK study no. GSK B100]
Carvedilol GSK B101 {unpublished data only}
    1. GlaxoSmithKline. A multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled comparison of carvedilol (SK&F 105517) 6.25mg, 12.5mg, 25mg, and 50mg administered once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.. http://www.gsk‐clinicalstudyregister.com/result_detail.jsp?protocolId=105517%2F022&stud... (accessed day month year ) Updated: 13 September 2005. [GSK protocol ID 105517/022 ; GSK study no. B101]
Frick 1976 {published data only}
    1. Frick MH, Porsti P. Combined alpha‐ and beta‐adrenoceptor blockade with labetalol in hypertension. British Medical Journal 1976;1:1046‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Kane 1976 {published data only}
    1. Kane J, Gregg I, Richards DA. A double blind trial of labetalol. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1976;Suppl:737‐41. - PubMed
Lechi 1982 {published data only}
    1. Lechi A, Pomari S, Berto R, Buniotto P, Parrinello A, Marini F, et al. Clinical evaluation of labetalol alone and combined with chlorthalidone in essential hypertension: a double blind multicenter controlled study. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1982;22:289‐93. - PubMed
McPhillips 1988 {published data only}
    1. McPhillips JJ, Schwemer GT, Scott DI, Zinny M, Patterson D. Effect of Carvedilol on Blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A dose response study. Drugs 1988;36(Suppl 6):82‐91. - PubMed
Rouffy 1986 {published data only}
    1. Rouffy J, Bakir R, Chanu B, Djian F, Goy‐Loeper J, Henry Amar M, et al. Effect of 400 mg/day labetalol on lipids, lipoproteins and apoproteins in hypertensive patients. Pathologie Biologie 1986;34(4):253‐8. - PubMed
Weber 2006 {published data only}
    1. Weber MA, Sica DA, Tarka EA, Iyengar M, Fleck R, Bakris GL. Controlled Release Carvedilol in the treatment of essential hypertension. American Journal of Cardiology 2006;98 Suppl:32L‐8L. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Dupont 1987 {published data only}
    1. Dupont AG, Niepen P, Taeymans Y, Ingels M, Piepsz A, Bossuyt AM, et al. Effect of carvedilol on ambulatory blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and cardiac function in essential hypertension. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 1987;10 Suppl 11:S130‐6. - PubMed
Horvath 1979 {published data only}
    1. Horvath JS, Caterson RJ, Collett P, Duggin GG, Kelly DH, Tiller DJ. Labetalol and bendrofluazide: comparison of their antihypertensive effects. Medical Journal of Australia 1979;1:626‐8. - PubMed
Kubik 1984 {published data only}
    1. Kubik MM, Coote JH. Propranolol vs metoprolol vs labetalol: A comparative study in essential hypertension. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1984;26:1‐6. - PubMed
Wilcox 1978 {published data only}
    1. Wilcox RG. Randomised study of six beta‐blockers and a thiazide diuretic in essential hypertension. British Medical Journal 1978;2(6134):383‐5. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Chen 2010a
    1. Chen JMH, Heran BS, Perez MI, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta‐blockers as second‐line therapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007185.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Chen 2010b
    1. Chen N, Zhou M, Yang M, Guo J, Zhu C, Yang J, et al. Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub4] - DOI - PubMed
eCPS
    1. Canadian Pharmacist Association. e‐Therapeutics. Available from https://www.e‐therapeutics.ca/cps.showMonograph.action (accessed October 2012) 2012.
FDA
    1. U.S. Food, Drug Administration. FDA Online Label Repository. Available from http://labels.fda.gov/ (accessed May 2013) 2013.
Goodman 2011
    1. Westfall TC, Westfall DP. Chapter 8: Neurotransmission: The Autonomic and Somatic Motor Nervous Systems. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B editor(s). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12. New York: The McGraw‐Hill Companies, Inc. , 2011:188‐227.
Heran 2008a
    1. Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003823.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Heran 2008b
    1. Heran BS, Wong MMY, Heran IK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003822.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Jadad 1996
    1. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carrol D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?. Controlled Clinical Trials 1996;17:1‐12. - PubMed
Law 2005
    1. Law M, Morris JK, Jordan R, Wald N. Headaches and the treatment of blood pressure results from a meta‐analysis of 94 randomized placebo‐controlled trials with 24 000 participants. Circulation 2005;112:2301‐6. - PubMed
Magee 2003
    1. Magee LA, Duley L. Oral beta‐blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002863] - DOI - PubMed
McTavish 1993
    1. McTavish D, Campoli‐Richards D, Sorkin EM. Carvedilol: A review of its pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 1993;45(2):232‐58. - PubMed
Musini 2008
    1. Musini VM, Fortin PM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of renin inhibitors for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007066.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Musini 2009
    1. Musini VM, Tejani AM, Bassett K, Wright JM. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in the elderly. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000028.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Musini 2014
    1. Musini VM, Nazer M, Bassett K, Wright JM. Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
NY Times 2013
    1. Thomas K. Breaking the Seal on Drug Research. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/30/business/breaking‐the‐seal‐on‐drug‐res... (accessed 14 October 2014) June 29, 2013.
Wisonge 2007
    1. Wiysonge CS, Bradley H, Mayosi BM, Maroney R, Mbewu A, Opie LH, et al. Beta blockers for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Wong 2008
    1. Wong GWK, Laugerotte A, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of beta‐1 selective beta blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007451] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wong 2014a
    1. Wong GWK, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of nonselective beta‐blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007452.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Wong 2014b
    1. Wong GWK, Boyda HN, Wright JM. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of partial agonist beta blocker monotherapy for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007450.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Wright 2000
    1. Wright JM. Choosing a first‐line drug in the management of elevated blood pressure: What is the evidence? 2: β‐Blockers. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 2000;163(2):188‐92. - PMC - PubMed
Wright 2009
    1. Wright JM, Musini VM. First‐line drugs for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Xue 2015
    1. Xue H, Lu Z, Tang WL, Pang LW, Wang GM, Wong GWK, et al. First‐line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first‐line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources