Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May-Jun;10(3):304-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

Predicting resting energy expenditure in young adults

Affiliations

Predicting resting energy expenditure in young adults

Erik A Willis et al. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016 May-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and validate a REE prediction equation for young adults.

Methods: Baseline data from two studies were pooled (N=318; women=52%) and randomly divided into development (n=159) and validation samples (n=159). REE was measured by indirect calorimetry. Stepwise regression was used to develop an equation to predict REE (University of Kansas (KU) equation). The KU equation and 5 additional REE prediction equations used in clinical practice (Mifflin-St. Jeor, Harris-Benedict, Owens, Frankenfield (2 equations)) were evaluated in the validation sample.

Results: There were no significant differences between predicted and measured REE using the KU equation for either men or women. The Mifflin-St. Jeor equation showed a non-significant mean bias in men; however, mean bias was statistically significant in women. The Harris-Benedict equation significantly over-predicted REE in both men and women. The Owens equation showed a significant mean bias in both men and women. Frankenfield equations #1 and #2 both significantly over-predicted REE in non-obese men and women. We found no significant differences between measured REE and REE predicted by the Frankenfield #2 equations in obese men and women.

Conclusion: The KU equation, which uses easily assessed characteristics (age, sex, weight) may offer better estimates of REE in young adults compared with the 5 other equations. The KU equation demonstrated adequate prediction accuracy, with approximately equal rates of over and under-prediction. However, enthusiasm for recommending any REE prediction equations evaluated for use in clinical weight management is damped by the highly variable individual prediction error evident with all these equations.

Keywords: Indirect calorimetry; Resting energy expenditure; Weight management; Young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of resting energy expenditure (REE) estimated by REE prediction equations and assessed by indirect calorimetry. (A) University of Kansas equation, (B) Mifflin–St. Jeor, (C) Harris–Benedict, (D) Owen, (E) Frankenfield #1 non-obese, (F) Frankenfield #1 obese, (G) Frankenfield #2 non-obese, (H) Frankenfield #2 obese.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Lamb MM, Flegal KM. Prevalence of high body mass index in US children and adolescents, 2007–2008. J Am Med Assoc. 2010;303:241–9. - PubMed
    1. Miller S, Milliron BJ, Woolf K. Common prediction equations overestimate measured resting metabolic rate in young Hispanic women. Top Clin Nutr. 2013;28:120–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Rodriguez G, Alkorta P, Labayen I. Validity of resting energy expenditure predictive equations before and after an energy-restricted diet intervention in obese women. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23759. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hasson RE, Howe CA, Jones BL, Freedson PS. Accuracy of four resting metabolic rate prediction equations: effects of sex, body mass index, age, and race/ethnicity. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:344–51. - PubMed
    1. Siervo M, Boschi V, Falconi C. Which REE prediction equation should we use in normal-weight, overweight and obese women. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:193–204. - PubMed

Publication types