Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials
- PMID: 25579834
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61368-4
Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials
Abstract
Background: Whether statin therapy is as effective in women as in men is debated, especially for primary prevention. We undertook a meta-analysis of statin trials in the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration database to compare the effects of statin therapy between women and men.
Methods: We performed meta-analyses on data from 22 trials of statin therapy versus control (n=134,537) and five trials of more-intensive versus less-intensive statin therapy (n=39,612). Effects on major vascular events, major coronary events, stroke, coronary revascularisation and mortality were weighted per 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol and effects in men and women compared with a Cox model that adjusted for non-sex differences. For subgroup analyses, we used 99% CIs to make allowance for the multiplicity of comparisons.
Findings: 46,675 (27%) of 174,149 randomly assigned participants were women. Allocation to a statin had similar absolute effects on 1 year lipid concentrations in both men and women (LDL cholesterol reduced by about 1.1 mmol/L in statin vs control trials and roughly 0.5 mmol/L for more-intensive vs less-intensive therapy). Women were generally at lower cardiovascular risk than were men in these trials. The proportional reductions per 1.0 mmol/L reduction in LDL cholesterol in major vascular events were similar overall for women (rate ratio [RR] 0.84, 99% CI 0.78-0.91) and men (RR 0.78, 99% CI 0.75-0.81, adjusted p value for heterogeneity by sex=0.33) and also for those women and men at less than 10% predicted 5 year absolute cardiovascular risk (adjusted heterogeneity p=0.11). Likewise, the proportional reductions in major coronary events, coronary revascularisation, and stroke did not differ significantly by sex. No adverse effect on rates of cancer incidence or non-cardiovascular mortality was noted for either sex. These net benefits translated into all-cause mortality reductions with statin therapy for both women (RR 0.91, 99% CI 0.84-0.99) and men (RR 0.90, 99% CI 0.86-0.95; adjusted heterogeneity p=0.43).
Interpretation: In men and women at an equivalent risk of cardiovascular disease, statin therapy is of similar effectiveness for the prevention of major vascular events.
Funding: UK Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, European Community Biomed Program.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Sex, statins, and statistics.Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1368-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62005-5. Epub 2015 Jan 14. Lancet. 2015. PMID: 25595662 No abstract available.
-
Dyslipidaemia: Statin therapy in men versus women.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Mar;12(3):131. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.4. Epub 2015 Jan 27. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25622849 No abstract available.
-
Men and women--similar but not identical: insights into LDL-lowering therapy in women from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaboration.Future Cardiol. 2015 Sep;11(5):511-5. doi: 10.2217/fca.15.46. Epub 2015 Sep 25. Future Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 26406297
-
When to treat hypercholesterolaemia.Med Clin (Barc). 2024 Mar 8;162(5):238-243. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Nov 2. Med Clin (Barc). 2024. PMID: 37925276 English, Spanish. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials.Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):407-415. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31942-1. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30712900 Free PMC article.
-
Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13985. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27673306 Review.
-
Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy.Lancet. 2016 Nov 19;388(10059):2532-2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5. Epub 2016 Sep 8. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 27616593 Review.
-
The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.Lancet. 2012 Aug 11;380(9841):581-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5. Epub 2012 May 17. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 22607822 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials.Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5. Epub 2010 Nov 8. Lancet. 2010. PMID: 21067804 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
First Iranian guidelines for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of hyperlipidemia in adults.J Res Med Sci. 2024 Mar 29;29:18. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_318_23. eCollection 2024. J Res Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38808220 Free PMC article.
-
Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists Position Paper 'Gender discrepancy: time to implement gender-based clinical management'.Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024 May 16;26(Suppl 2):ii264-ii293. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae034. eCollection 2024 Apr. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2024. PMID: 38784671 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-based utilization of guideline recommended statin therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes: Data from a multisite healthcare network primary prevention cohort.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024 May 9;18:100667. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100667. eCollection 2024 Jun. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38779188 Free PMC article.
-
Statins use and recurrent venous thromboembolism in the direct oral anticoagulant era: insight from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 May 18. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03002-0. Online ahead of print. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024. PMID: 38762713
-
Probucol mitigates high-fat diet-induced cognitive and social impairments by regulating brain redox and insulin resistance.Front Neurosci. 2024 Apr 23;18:1368552. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1368552. eCollection 2024. Front Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38716255 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical