Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan:134:193-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good

Guy Kahane  1 , Jim A C Everett  2 , Brian D Earp  3 , Miguel Farias  4 , Julian Savulescu  1
Affiliations

'Utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good

Guy Kahane et al. Cognition. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

A growing body of research has focused on so-called 'utilitarian' judgments in moral dilemmas in which participants have to choose whether to sacrifice one person in order to save the lives of a greater number. However, the relation between such 'utilitarian' judgments and genuine utilitarian impartial concern for the greater good remains unclear. Across four studies, we investigated the relationship between 'utilitarian' judgment in such sacrificial dilemmas and a range of traits, attitudes, judgments and behaviors that either reflect or reject an impartial concern for the greater good of all. In Study 1, we found that rates of 'utilitarian' judgment were associated with a broadly immoral outlook concerning clear ethical transgressions in a business context, as well as with sub-clinical psychopathy. In Study 2, we found that 'utilitarian' judgment was associated with greater endorsement of rational egoism, less donation of money to a charity, and less identification with the whole of humanity, a core feature of classical utilitarianism. In Studies 3 and 4, we found no association between 'utilitarian' judgments in sacrificial dilemmas and characteristic utilitarian judgments relating to assistance to distant people in need, self-sacrifice and impartiality, even when the utilitarian justification for these judgments was made explicit and unequivocal. This lack of association remained even when we controlled for the antisocial element in 'utilitarian' judgment. Taken together, these results suggest that there is very little relation between sacrificial judgments in the hypothetical dilemmas that dominate current research, and a genuine utilitarian approach to ethics.

Keywords: Altruism; Impartiality; Moral dilemmas; Moral judgment; Psychopathy; Utilitarianism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bartels D.M., Pizarro D.A. The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition. 2011;121(1):154–161. - PubMed
    1. Bentham, J. (1789/1961). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In Utilitarianism (pp. 7–398). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    1. Choe S.Y., Min K.-H. Who makes utilitarian judgments? The influences of emotions on utilitarian judgments. Judgment and Decision Making. 2011;6:580–592.
    1. Conway P., Gawronski B. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013;104(2):216–235. - PubMed
    1. Cooper M.J., Pullig C. I’m number one! Does narcissism impair ethical judgment even for the highly religious? Journal of Business Ethics. 2013;112(1):167–176.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources