Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;7(2):123-136.
doi: 10.1007/s12152-013-9189-5. Epub 2013 Aug 17.

Autonomy and Enhancement

G Owen Schaefer  1 , Guy Kahane  2 , Julian Savulescu  2
Affiliations

Autonomy and Enhancement

G Owen Schaefer et al. Neuroethics. 2014.

Abstract

Some have objected to human enhancement on the grounds that it violates the autonomy of the enhanced. These objections, however, overlook the interesting possibility that autonomy itself could be enhanced. How, exactly, to enhance autonomy is a difficult problem due to the numerous and diverse accounts of autonomy in the literature. Existing accounts of autonomy enhancement rely on narrow and controversial conceptions of autonomy. However, we identify one feature of autonomy common to many mainstream accounts: reasoning ability. Autonomy can then be enhanced by improving people's reasoning ability, in particular through cognitive enhancement; given how valuable autonomy is usually taken to be, this gives us extra reason to pursue such cognitive enhancements. Moreover, autonomy-based objections will be especially weak against such enhancements. As we will argue, those who are worried that enhancements will inhibit people's autonomy should actually embrace those enhancements that will improve autonomy.

Keywords: Autonomy; Cognition; Enhancement; Reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Elliott, C. 2003. Better than Well: American Medicine Meets the American Dream. New York: W.W. Norton & co.
    1. Annas GJ. The man on the moon, immortality, and other millenial myths: The prospects and perils of human genetic engineering. Emory Law Journal. 2000;49:753–782. - PubMed
    1. Fukuyama F. Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2002.
    1. The President’s Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC.
    1. Sandel MJ. The case against perfection. Cambridge: Belknap; 2007.

LinkOut - more resources