Incidence and relevance of groin incisional complications after aortobifemoral bypass grafting
- PMID: 25011088
- DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.06.064
Incidence and relevance of groin incisional complications after aortobifemoral bypass grafting
Abstract
Background: Aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is traditionally accompanied by substantial groin incisional morbidity, which poses a threat to an underlying prosthetic graft. We performed a study to investigate the frequency and define the clinical course and significance of such problems.
Methods: One hundred twenty consecutive patients undergoing primary elective ABFB for AIOD were enrolled in a prospective study. The healing of groin wounds was systematically assessed, the occurrence of incisional complications of any type noted, and their clinical course and economic consequences documented and analyzed.
Results: Early postoperative complications (30 days) affected 35 (15%) groin wounds in 29 (24.8%) patients. Lymph fistulas/lymphoceles were observed in 15 (6.4%), infection in 11 (4.7%), and noninfectious wound dehiscence in 9 (3.8%) of groin incisions. The only significant predictor of groin healing impairment was preoperative length of stay. Groin incision-related morbidity significantly increased the duration and cost of hospitalization. Sixty percent of groin healing problems were diagnosed after discharge and they represented the most common cause for early readmissions.
Conclusions: The incidence of groin wound complications after ABFB is considerable, their financial impact significant, and delayed onset frequent. Femoral incisional morbidity after ABFB still represents an unremitting nuisance, necessitating further improvements in preventive strategies and techniques and strict adherence to conventional ones, including the minimization of preoperative length of stay.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Total laparoscopic bypass is safe and effective for aortoiliac occlusive disease.J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.018. J Vasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25720928
-
[Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):24-35. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997. PMID: 17974352 Serbian.
-
Contemporary outcomes of iliofemoral bypass grafting for unilateral aortoiliac occlusive disease: a 10-year experience.Am Surg. 2008 Jun;74(6):555-9; discussion 559-60. Am Surg. 2008. PMID: 18557000
-
Inflow disease: an under-recognised cause of infra-inguinal graft failure?Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Aug;10(4):297-8. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(02)00015-7. Cardiovasc Surg. 2002. PMID: 12359396 Review. No abstract available.
-
Role of negative pressure wound therapy in treating peripheral vascular graft infections.Vascular. 2008 Jul-Aug;16(4):194-200. doi: 10.2310/6670.2008.00041. Vascular. 2008. PMID: 18845099 Review.
Cited by
-
Algorithmic approach to the lymphatic leak after vascular reconstruction: a systematic review.Arch Plast Surg. 2021 Jul;48(4):404-409. doi: 10.5999/aps.2020.02075. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Arch Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34352953 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with Wound Complications after Open Femoral Artery Exposure for Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.Int J Angiol. 2019 Jun;28(2):124-129. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683898. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Int J Angiol. 2019. PMID: 31384110 Free PMC article.
-
[Locoregional solutions for groin defects : Coverage after vascular surgery].Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(1):43-49. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0244-8. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 27435247 Review. German.
-
Strategies for managing aortoiliac occlusions: access, treatment and outcomes.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 May;13(5):551-63. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1036741. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015. PMID: 25907618 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical