Positive animal welfare states and reference standards for welfare assessment
- PMID: 24875152
- DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926802
Positive animal welfare states and reference standards for welfare assessment
Abstract
Developments in affective neuroscience and behavioural science during the last 10-15 years have together made it increasingly apparent that sentient animals are potentially much more sensitive to their environmental and social circumstances than was previously thought to be the case. It therefore seems likely that both the range and magnitude of welfare trade-offs that occur when animals are managed for human purposes have been underestimated even when minimalistic but arguably well-intentioned attempts have been made to maintain high levels of welfare. In light of these neuroscience-supported behaviour-based insights, the present review considers the extent to which the use of currently available reference standards might draw attention to these previously neglected areas of concern. It is concluded that the natural living orientation cannot provide an all-embracing or definitive welfare benchmark because of its primary focus on behavioural freedom. However assessments of this type, supported by neuroscience insights into behavioural motivation, may now carry greater weight when used to identify management practices that should be avoided, discontinued or substantially modified. Using currently accepted baseline standards as welfare reference points may result in small changes being accorded greater significance than would be the case if they were compared with higher standards, and this could slow the progress towards better levels of welfare. On the other hand, using "what animals want" as a reference standard has the appeal of focusing on the specific resources or conditions the animals would choose themselves and can potentially improve their welfare more quickly than the approach of making small increments above baseline standards. It is concluded that the cautious use of these approaches in different combinations could lead to recommendations that would more effectively promote positive welfare states in hitherto neglected areas of concern.
Keywords: Affective neuroscience; baseline standards; cognitive bias; natural living; positive welfare; reference standards; what animals want.
Similar articles
-
Scientific assessment of animal welfare.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):24-30. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.966167. Epub 2014 Dec 11. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 25263963 Review.
-
Different animal welfare orientations towards some key research areas of current relevance to pastoral dairy farming in New Zealand.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):31-6. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.958117. Epub 2014 Dec 3. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 25157557 Review.
-
Positive animal welfare states and encouraging environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):9-16. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926800. Epub 2014 Oct 9. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 24875367 Review.
-
Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement.N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):3-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926799. Epub 2014 Aug 14. N Z Vet J. 2015. PMID: 24875268 Review.
-
Animal emotions, behaviour and the promotion of positive welfare states.N Z Vet J. 2012 Jan;60(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2011.619047. N Z Vet J. 2012. PMID: 22175422 Review.
Cited by
-
Pseudopregnant mice generated from Piwil1 deficiency sterile mice.PLoS One. 2024 May 21;19(5):e0296414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296414. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38771805 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive assessment of positive affective state using infra-red thermography in rats.Anim Welf. 2023 Sep 29;32:e66. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.87. eCollection 2023. Anim Welf. 2023. PMID: 38510988 Free PMC article.
-
Finding biomarkers of experience in animals.J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 20;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40104-023-00989-z. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024. PMID: 38374201 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The agency domain and behavioral interactions: assessing positive animal welfare using the Five Domains Model.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Nov 2;10:1284869. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1284869. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 38026638 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Choice, control, and animal welfare: definitions and essential inquiries to advance animal welfare science.Front Vet Sci. 2023 Aug 2;10:1250251. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1250251. eCollection 2023. Front Vet Sci. 2023. PMID: 37601746 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources