Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;33(2):155-173.
doi: 10.1007/s12144-013-9203-4.

Self-Standards and Self-Discrepancies. A Structural Model of Self-Knowledge

Waclaw Bak  1
Affiliations

Self-Standards and Self-Discrepancies. A Structural Model of Self-Knowledge

Waclaw Bak. Curr Psychol. 2014.

Abstract

A model of self-knowledge is proposed which summarizes and integrates a few distinctions concerning self-standards and related self-discrepancies. Four types of self-standards are distinguished (i.e. ideal, ought, undesired and forbidden selves) and a hierarchical organization of these standards is postulated. There is a basic contrast between positive and negative standards at the higher level of the hierarchy, whereas Higgins' distinction between ideals and oughts is found at the lower level. Every self-standard is analyzed in terms of two types of self-discrepancies. Many previous studies explored discrepancies between self-standards and the actual self, i.e. the perceived actualization of standards. The present study proposed that discrepancies between self-standards and the can self are a second type of discrepancy that should be included in structural models of self-knowledge. The can self consists of self-beliefs referring to capabilities and potentials; thus, this additional type of discrepancy reflects the perceived attainability of standards. Consequently, the present study explored a set of eight self-discrepancies, i.e. both the perceived actualization and the attainability of four self-standards. In order to assess the intercorrelations among these eight self-discrepancies, participants (N = 404) completed a newly developed online measure. CFA modeling confirmed the postulated two-level hierarchy of self-standards. The reasonability of including discrepancies between self-standards and the can self in the structural model of self-knowledge was also confirmed.

Keywords: Attainability of standards; CFA; Can self; Self-discrepancies; Self-standards.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model 1 – the hierarchical model of self-standards and related self-discrepancies. The hierarchy of self-standards is represented at the level of latent variables (ellipses). The observed variables (rectangles) are discrepancies between self-standards and the actual self/the can self. Standardized estimates are reported
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Model 2 – the alternative version of the hierarchical model. Standardized estimates are reported
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amico KR, Bruch MA, Haase RF, Sturmer PJ. Trait shyness, actual-ought self-discrepancy and discomfort in social interaction. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004
    1. Arbuckle JS. AmosTM 18 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation; 2009.
    1. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001 - PubMed
    1. Birnbaum MH. Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology. 2004 - PubMed
    1. Buss KA, Schumacher JRM, Dolski I, Kalin NH, Goldsmith HH, Davidson RJ. Right frontal brain activity, cortisol, and withdrawal behavior in 6-month-old infants. Behavioral Neuroscience. 2003 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources