Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 24799865
- PMCID: PMC4009585
Propofol or Thiopental sodium in patients undergoing reproductive assisted technologies: Differences in hemodynamic recovery and outcome of oocyte retrieval: A randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Thiopental sodium and Propofol are two widely-used drugs in the induction of anesthesia in assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, the side effects and outcome of recovery from anesthesia of these drugs on ART have not been identified yet.
Objective: This study aimed at investigating the side effects and hemodynamic effects of using thiopental sodium and propofal as well as effects of these drugs on pregnancy outcome in ART cycles.
Materials and methods: In this double blinded) randomized controlled trial, 90 woman candidate for ART were randomly divided into two groups. 47 patients received Propofol (2.5 mg/kg) and 43 patients received thiopental (5mg/kg) for anesthesia induction. The entry hemodynamic parameters of the patients were documented. During the anesthesia process, hemodynamic parameters were checked at five-minute intervals.
Results: The results of the study showed a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of their response to verbal stimulation (p<0.001), the normalization time of the rate and quality of breathing (p<0.001), nausea (p<0.001), and vomiting (p<0.001). Also, in comparison with the other group, all these parameters were better in Propofol group. There was found no significant difference between two groups in terms of other variables.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, Propofol has fewer known side effects. Vomiting and nausea as two known side effect of anesthesia are significantly lower in patients receiving Propofol than patients who received thiopental.
Registration id in irct: IRCT201303135393N2 This article extracted from M.D. thesis. (Reza Jouya).
Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology.; Propofol; Thiopental sodium.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4009585/bin/ijrm-12-077-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4009585/bin/ijrm-12-077-g002.gif)
![Figure 3](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4009585/bin/ijrm-12-077-g003.gif)
![Figure 4](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4009585/bin/ijrm-12-077-g004.gif)
Similar articles
-
Effects of induction anesthetic agents on outcome of assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of propofol and thiopental sodium.Chang Gung Med J. 2000 Sep;23(9):513-9. Chang Gung Med J. 2000. PMID: 11092139
-
A comparison to facilitate insertion of the laryngeal mask: term of recovery and postoperative nausea and vomiting after anesthesia with propofol- atracurium and thiopental-atracurium.Acta Med Iran. 2015;53(2):117-21. Acta Med Iran. 2015. PMID: 25725181 Clinical Trial.
-
Propofol versus thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval: a randomized controlled trial.Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Dec;31(6):752-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015. PMID: 26515147 Clinical Trial.
-
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 25;(6):CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD009202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009202.pub4. PMID: 26111021 Updated. Review.
-
Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (Review).Evid Based Child Health. 2013 Jul;8(4):1488-508. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1929. Evid Based Child Health. 2013. PMID: 23877948 Review.
Cited by
-
Association of IL-12B rs3212227 and IL-6 rs1800795 Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 May 1;21(5):1197-1206. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.5.1197. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020. PMID: 32458622 Free PMC article.
-
The Uterine Immune Profile May Help Women With Repeated Unexplained Embryo Implantation Failure After In Vitro Fertilization.Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016 Mar;75(3):388-401. doi: 10.1111/aji.12483. Epub 2016 Jan 18. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016. PMID: 26777262 Free PMC article.
-
Anesthesia Related Toxic Effects on In Vitro Fertilization Outcome: Burden of Proof.Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:475362. doi: 10.1155/2015/475362. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Biomed Res Int. 2015. PMID: 26161404 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Martin R, Tsen LC, Tzeng G, Hornstein MD, Datta S. Anesthesia for in vitro fertilization: the addition of fentanyl to 1.5% lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:523–526. - PubMed
-
- Soussis I, Boyd O, Paraschos T, Duffy S, Bower S, Troughton P, et al. Follicular fluid levels of midazolam, fentanyl, and alfentanil during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:1003–1007. - PubMed
-
- Endler GC, Stout M, Magyar DM, Hayes MF, Moghissi KS, Sacco AG. Follicular fluid concentrations of thiopental and thiamylal during laparoscopy for oocyte retrieval. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:828–833. - PubMed
-
- Pierce ET, Smalky M, Alper MM, Hunter JA, Amrhein RL, Pierce EC Jr. Comparison of pregnancy rates following gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) under general anesthesia with thiopental sodium or Propofol. J Clin Anesth. 1992;4:394–398. - PubMed
-
- Tramer MR, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Propofol and bradycardia: causation, frequency and severity. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:642–651. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources