Emotion, working memory task demands and individual differences predict behavior, cognitive effort and negative affect
- PMID: 24697353
- DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.904222
Emotion, working memory task demands and individual differences predict behavior, cognitive effort and negative affect
Abstract
We examined whether positive and negative affect motivates verbal and spatial working memory processes, respectively, which have implications for the expenditure of mental effort. We argue that when emotion promotes cognitive tendencies that are goal incompatible with task demands, greater cognitive effort is required to perform well. We sought to investigate whether this increase in cognitive effort impairs behavioural control over a broad domain of self-control tasks. Moreover, we predicted that individuals with higher behavioural inhibition system (BIS) sensitivities would report more negative affect within the goal incompatible conditions because such individuals report higher negative affect during cognitive challenge. Positive or negative affective states were induced followed by completing a verbal or spatial 2-back working memory task. All participants then completed one of three self-control tasks. Overall, we observed that conditions of emotion and working memory incompatibility (positive/spatial and negative/verbal) performed worse on the self-control tasks, and within the incompatible conditions individuals with higher BIS sensitivities reported more negative affect at the end of the study. The combination of findings suggests that emotion and working memory compatibility reduces cognitive effort and impairs behavioural control.
Keywords: BIS; Cognitive control; Emotion; Negative affect.
Similar articles
-
Individual differences in cognitive control processes and their relationship to emotion regulation.Cogn Emot. 2016 Aug;30(5):912-24. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1032893. Epub 2015 May 7. Cogn Emot. 2016. PMID: 25947896
-
Verbal makes it positive, spatial makes it negative: working memory biases judgments, attention, and moods.Emotion. 2014 Dec;14(6):1072-86. doi: 10.1037/a0037327. Epub 2014 Jul 7. Emotion. 2014. PMID: 24999914
-
Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Dec;95(6):1526-40. doi: 10.1037/a0013345. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008. PMID: 19025300
-
A cognitive control framework for understanding emotion regulation flexibility.Emotion. 2020 Feb;20(1):21-29. doi: 10.1037/emo0000658. Emotion. 2020. PMID: 31961173 Review.
-
A Working Memory System With Distributed Executive Control.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Jan;11(1):74-100. doi: 10.1177/1745691615596790. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016. PMID: 26817727 Review.
Cited by
-
Working Memory Models and Measures in Language and Bilingualism Research: Integrating Cognitive and Affective Perspectives.Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):729. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060729. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35741614 Free PMC article. Review.
-
What emotion dimensions can affect working memory performance in healthy adults? A review.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 14;10(2):401-411. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.401. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35097065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.Psychol Bull. 2019 Jun;145(6):566-609. doi: 10.1037/bul0000193. Epub 2019 Apr 25. Psychol Bull. 2019. PMID: 31021136 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous