Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 4:8:12.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00012. eCollection 2014.

When is diminishment a form of enhancement? Rethinking the enhancement debate in biomedical ethics

Brian D Earp  1 , Anders Sandberg  2 , Guy Kahane  3 , Julian Savulescu  1
Affiliations

When is diminishment a form of enhancement? Rethinking the enhancement debate in biomedical ethics

Brian D Earp et al. Front Syst Neurosci. .

Abstract

The enhancement debate in neuroscience and biomedical ethics tends to focus on the augmentation of certain capacities or functions: memory, learning, attention, and the like. Typically, the point of contention is whether these augmentative enhancements should be considered permissible for individuals with no particular "medical" disadvantage along any of the dimensions of interest. Less frequently addressed in the literature, however, is the fact that sometimes the diminishment of a capacity or function, under the right set of circumstances, could plausibly contribute to an individual's overall well-being: more is not always better, and sometimes less is more. Such cases may be especially likely, we suggest, when trade-offs in our modern environment have shifted since the environment of evolutionary adaptation. In this article, we introduce the notion of "diminishment as enhancement" and go on to defend a welfarist conception of enhancement. We show how this conception resolves a number of definitional ambiguities in the enhancement literature, and we suggest that it can provide a useful framework for thinking about the use of emerging neurotechnologies to promote human flourishing.

Keywords: bioethics; diminishment; empathy; enhancement; neuroenhancement; neuroethics; welfare; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Allhoff F., Lin P., Moor J., Weckert J. (2009). Ethics of human enhancement: 25 questions & answers. Stud. Ethics Law Technol. 4, 1–50 10.2202/1941-6008.1110 - DOI
    1. Baranski J. V., Pigeau R., Dinich P., Jacobs I. (2004). Effects of modafinil on cognitive and meta−cognitive performance. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 19, 323–332 10.1002/hup.596 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barch D. (2004). Pharmacological manipulation of human working memory. Psychopharmacology 174, 126–135 10.1007/s00213-003-1732-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S. (2011). Autism, empathizing-systemizing (e-s) theory, and pathological altruism, in Pathological Altruism, eds Oakley B., Knafo A., Madhaven G., Wilson D. S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 344–348
    1. Bartz J. A., Zaki J., Bolger N., Hollander E., Ludwig N. N., Kolevzon A., et al. (2010). Oxytocin selectively improves empathic accuracy. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1426–1428 10.1177/0956797610383439 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources