Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;25(4):934-42.
doi: 10.1177/0956797613518352. Epub 2014 Jan 30.

Stress contagion: physiological covariation between mothers and infants

Affiliations

Stress contagion: physiological covariation between mothers and infants

Sara F Waters et al. Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Emotions are not simply concepts that live privately in the mind, but rather affective states that emanate from the individual and may influence others. We explored affect contagion in the context of one of the closest dyadic units, mother and infant. We initially separated mothers and infants; randomly assigned the mothers to experience a stressful positive-evaluation task, a stressful negative-evaluation task, or a nonstressful control task; and then reunited the mothers and infants. Three notable findings were obtained: First, infants' physiological reactivity mirrored mothers' reactivity engendered by the stress manipulation. Second, infants whose mothers experienced social evaluation showed more avoidance toward strangers compared with infants whose mothers were in the control condition. Third, the negative-evaluation condition, compared with the other conditions, generated greater physiological covariation in the dyads, and this covariation increased over time. These findings suggest that mothers' stressful experiences are contagious to their infants and that members of close pairs, like mothers and infants, can reciprocally influence each other's dynamic physiological reactivity.

Keywords: electrophysiology; emotional development; infant development; social behavior; stress reactions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the procedure. Dashed outlines indicate that the mother was alone; for all other periods, the mother and infant were together. Bold outlines indicate the periods from which the mother’s and infant’s physiological data were taken for covariation analyses. Q&A = question-and-answer session.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mothers’ and infants’ physiological reactivity during the poststress interviews: (a) mothers’ mean increase in ventricle contractility and (b) infants’ mean heart rate reactivity as a function of mothers’ evaluation condition. Error bars represent ±1 SE.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Infants’ mean behavioral avoidance of the interviewers as a function of mothers’ evaluation condition. Error bars represent ±1 SE.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Covariation of infants’ heart rate (HR) reactivity and mothers’ ventricle contractility (VC) reactivity over time, from reunion through toy play, in the three evaluation conditions. Covariation is indexed as the effect of (standardized) infants’ HR reactivity on (standardized) mothers’ VC reactivity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akinola M, Mendes WB. The dark side of creativity: Biological vulnerability and negative emotions lead to greater artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2008;34:1677–1686. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF. Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1:28–58. - PubMed
    1. Baumeister RF, Bratislavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology. 2001;5:323–370.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol. I. Attachment. 2nd ed. Basic Books; New York, NY: 1982.
    1. Buchanan TW, Bagley SL, Stansfield B, Preston SD. The empathic, physiological resonance of stress. Social Neuroscience. 2012;7:191–201. - PubMed

Publication types