Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;46(7):1352-8.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000232.

Examining variations of resting metabolic rate of adults: a public health perspective

Robert G McMurray  1 , Jesus Soares, Carl J Caspersen, Thomas McCurdy
Affiliations
Review

Examining variations of resting metabolic rate of adults: a public health perspective

Robert G McMurray et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: There has not been a recent comprehensive effort to examine existing studies on the resting metabolic rate (RMR) of adults to identify the effect of common population demographic and anthropometric characteristics. Thus, we reviewed the literature on RMR (kcal·kg(-1)·h(-1)) to determine the relationship of age, sex, and obesity status to RMR as compared with the commonly accepted value for the metabolic equivalent (MET; e.g., 1.0 kcal·kg(-1)·h(-1)).

Methods: Using several databases, scientific articles published from 1980 to 2011 were identified that measured RMR, and from those, others dating back to 1920 were identified. One hundred and ninety-seven studies were identified, resulting in 397 publication estimates of RMR that could represent a population subgroup. Inverse variance weighting technique was applied to compute means and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: The mean value for RMR was 0.863 kcal·kg(-1)·h(-1) (95% CI = 0.852-0.874), higher for men than women, decreasing with increasing age, and less in overweight than normal weight adults. Regardless of sex, adults with BMI ≥ 30 kg·m(-2) had the lowest RMR (<0.741 kcal·kg(-1)·h(-1)).

Conclusions: No single value for RMR is appropriate for all adults. Adhering to the nearly universally accepted MET convention may lead to the overestimation of the RMR of approximately 10% for men and almost 15% for women and be as high as 20%-30% for some demographic and anthropometric combinations. These large errors raise questions about the longstanding adherence to the conventional MET value for RMR. Failure to recognize this discrepancy may result in important miscalculations of energy expended from interventions using physical activity for diabetes and other chronic disease prevention efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Adjusted mean with 95% CI for the RMR (kcal·kg−1·h−1) for adults from 351 publication estimates presented by nine age groupings and sex. The number of publication estimates in each category is included on the x-axis for men (M) and women (W). Solid line = 1.0 kcal·kg−1·h−1.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Adjusted mean with 95% CI for the RMR (kcal·kg−1·h−1) for adults from 278 publication estimates, based on BMI (kg·m−2) categories of normal (< 25), overweight (25–29.9), and obese (≥ 30) adults presented by sex. The number of publication estimates in each category is included on the x-axis for men (M) and women (W). Solid line = 1.0 kcal·kg−1·h−1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Adjusted mean with 95% CI for the RMR (kcal·kg−1·h−1) for adults from 266 publication estimates, presented by sex, three age groupings, and BMI. The number of publication estimates for BMI groups is included on the x-axis for normal weight (Nm), overweight (Ov), and obese (Ob). Solid line = 1.0 kcal·kg−1·h−1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–1581. - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al. Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25(1):71–80. - PubMed
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9 Suppl):S498–S516. - PubMed
    1. Arciero PJ, Goran MI, Poehlman ET. Resting metabolic rate is lower in women than in men. J Appl Physiol. 1993;75(6):2514–2520. - PubMed
    1. Armellini F, Robbi R, Zamboni M, Todesco T, Castelli S, Bosello O. Resting metabolic rate, body-fat distribution, and visceral fat in obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56(6):981–987. - PubMed