Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection
- PMID: 23915041
- DOI: 10.1037/a0033777
Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection
Abstract
Although mate preference research has firmly established that men value physical attractiveness more than women do and women value social status more than men do, recent speed-dating studies have indicated mixed evidence (at best) for whether people's sex-differentiated mate preferences predict actual mate choices. According to an evolutionary, mate preference priority model (Li, Bailey, Kenrick, & Linsenmeier, 2002; Li & Kenrick, 2006; Li, Valentine, & Patel, 2011), the sexes are largely similar in what they ideally like, but for long-term mates, they should differ on what they most want to avoid in early selection contexts. Following this model, we conducted experiments using online messaging and modified speed-dating platforms. Results indicate that when a mating pool includes people at the low end of social status and physical attractiveness, mate choice criteria are sex-differentiated: Men, more than women, chose mates based on physical attractiveness, whereas women, more than men, chose mates based on social status. In addition, individuals who more greatly valued social status or physical attractiveness on paper valued these traits more in their actual choices. In particular, mate choices were sex-differentiated when considering long-term relationships but not short-term ones, where both sexes shunned partners with low physical attractiveness. The findings validate a large body of mate preferences research and an evolutionary perspective on mating, and they have implications for research using speed-dating and other interactive contexts.
PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16594832
-
The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):947-55. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002. PMID: 12051582
-
Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship.Anthropol Anz. 2003 Sep;61(3):331-41. Anthropol Anz. 2003. PMID: 14524006
-
Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations.Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:77-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408. Epub 2018 Sep 19. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30230999 Review.
-
Evolution of human mate choice.J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):27-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552211. J Sex Res. 2004. PMID: 15216422 Review.
Cited by
-
Income and Sex Moderate the Association Between Population Density and Reproduction: A Multilevel Analysis of Life History Strategies Across 23 Nations.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02955-w. Online ahead of print. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 39039341
-
What Do Different People Look for in a Partner? Effects of Sex, Sexual Orientation, and Mating Strategies on Partner Preferences.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):981-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02767-4. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38413532
-
Love Matters: The Effect of Mating Motive on Female Food Choice.Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Mar;53(3):969-979. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02768-3. Epub 2023 Dec 28. Arch Sex Behav. 2024. PMID: 38155337
-
When biology takes over: TV formats like The Bachelor and The Bachelorette confirm evolutionary theories of partner selection.Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 3;14:1219915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1219915. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37599774 Free PMC article.
-
A Critical Review of the Literature Regarding the Selection of Long-Term Romantic Partners.Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Oct;52(7):3025-3042. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02646-y. Epub 2023 Jul 7. Arch Sex Behav. 2023. PMID: 37420089 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical