Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding
- PMID: 22645330
- PMCID: PMC3382477
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200717109
Human origins and the transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding
Abstract
A crucial step in recent theories of human origins is the emergence of strong pair-bonding between males and females accompanied by a dramatic reduction in the male-to-male conflict over mating and an increased investment in offspring. How such a transition from promiscuity to pair-bonding could be achieved is puzzling. Many species would, indeed, be much better off evolutionarily if the effort spent on male competition over mating was redirected to increasing female fertility or survivorship of offspring. Males, however, are locked in a "social dilemma," where shifting one's effort from "appropriation" to "production" would give an advantage to free-riding competitors and therefore, should not happen. Here, I first consider simple models for four prominent scenarios of the human transition to pair-bonding: communal care, mate guarding, food for mating, and mate provisioning. I show that the transition is not feasible under biologically relevant conditions in any of these models. Then, I show that the transition can happen if one accounts for male heterogeneity, assortative pair formation, and evolution of female choice and faithfulness. This process is started when low-ranked males begin using an alternative strategy of female provisioning. At the end, except for the top-ranked individuals, males invest exclusively in provisioning females who have evolved very high fidelity to their mates. My results point to the crucial importance of female choice and emphasize the need for incorporating between-individual variation in theoretical and empirical studies of social dilemmas and behaviors.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
![Fig. 1.](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/3382477/bin/pnas.1200717109fig01.gif)
Similar articles
-
Evolution of male strategies with sex-ratio-dependent pay-offs: connecting pair bonds with grandmothering.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 19;372(1729):20170041. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0041. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 28760768 Free PMC article.
-
Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.J Anim Ecol. 2020 Aug;89(8):1851-1859. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13240. Epub 2020 May 14. J Anim Ecol. 2020. PMID: 32329064
-
Further Mathematical Modelling of Mating Sex Ratios & Male Strategies with Special Relevance to Human Life History.Bull Math Biol. 2017 Aug;79(8):1907-1922. doi: 10.1007/s11538-017-0313-2. Epub 2017 Jun 28. Bull Math Biol. 2017. PMID: 28660545
-
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):21-64. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005423. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000. PMID: 10740892 Review.
-
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005693. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001. PMID: 11569787 Review.
Cited by
-
Sex ratios and gender norms: why both are needed to understand sexual conflict in humans.Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Jan 30;6:e10. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.3. eCollection 2024. Evol Hum Sci. 2024. PMID: 38414809 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Romantic love evolved by co-opting mother-infant bonding.Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 17;14:1176067. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1176067. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37915523 Free PMC article.
-
Convergent rates of protein evolution identify novel targets of sexual selection in primates.Evolution. 2024 Feb 1;78(2):364-377. doi: 10.1093/evolut/qpad188. Evolution. 2024. PMID: 37864838
-
Ethnoscientific expertise and knowledge specialisation in 55 traditional cultures.Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jun 14;3:e37. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.31. eCollection 2021. Evol Hum Sci. 2021. PMID: 37588549 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of early hominin food production and sharing.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2218096120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2218096120. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 37311000 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alexander RD. How Did Humans Evolve? Reflections on the Uniquely Unique Species. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ of Michigan, Museum of Zoology; 1990.
-
- Flinn MV, Geary DC, Ward CV. Ecological dominance, social competition, and coalitionary arms races: Why humans evolved extraordinary intelligence? Evol Hum Behav. 2005;26:10–46.
-
- Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Not by Genes Alone. How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: Univ of Chicago Press; 2005.
-
- Hrdy SB. Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 2011.
-
- Lovejoy CO. Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidis. Science. 2009;326:74e1–74e8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources