Exact dual energy material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR)
- PMID: 21452706
- DOI: 10.1118/1.3533686
Exact dual energy material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR)
Abstract
Purpose: Dual energy CT (DECT) allows calculating images that show the spatial distribution of the electron density and the atomic number or, more common, images of two basis material densities. In contrast, the Hounsfield unit that is shown in standard CT images is a measure of the x-ray attenuation, which is a function of the atomic number and electron density. To acquire additional information, DECT measures the object of interest using two different detected x-ray spectra. Most clinical CT scanners realize dual energy CT by fast tube voltage switching or by dual source dual detector arrangements and therefore do not allow measuring geometrically identical lines with each spectrum. Then, it is not possible to preprocess the raw data and calculate dual energy-specific raw data sets. The combination of the information of both spectra rather needs to be carried out in image domain after image reconstruction. Compared to the ideal raw data-based dual energy approaches, those image-based DECT methods are inferior because they are not able to correctly deal with the polychromatic nature of the x-rays. This article proposes a dedicated dual energy reconstruction algorithm for inconsistent rays that correctly accounts for all spectral effects.
Methods: Material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR) is an iterative method to indirectly perform raw data-based DECT even though different lines were measured for both spectra. Its iterative nature allows treating the x-ray polychromaticity correctly. The iterative process is initialized by density images that were obtained from an image-based material decomposition. Those images suffer from errors that originate from the polychromatic nature of the spectra. These errors are calculated by polychromatic forward projection of each measured line. After correction of the initial material density images, the polychromatic forward projection is repeated with more accurate material density images, yielding a more accurate error calculation. To demonstrate the proposed method, simulations and measurements were performed using clinical and preclinical dual source dual energy CT scanners.
Results: Two iterations of MDIR are sufficient to greatly improve the qualitative and quantitative information in material density images. It is shown that banding artifacts, cupping artifacts, and mean density errors can be completely eliminated. Simulations with high geometrical inconsistency between the rays of different spectra indicate that nearly exact material decomposition is possible with MDIR. Furthermore, simulations show that the method works well in the presence of materials with K-edges within the detected spectrum. Phantom measurements using a clinical dual source CT scanner show the elimination of artifacts, which cause up to 4% mean density error.
Conclusions: At moderate computational burden, the proposed MDIR algorithm yields images of the same high quality as direct raw data-based DECT methods. In contrast to those, MDIR is applicable to the case of inconsistent rays, as it often occurs in clinical or preclinical CT. Compared to image-based methods MDIR reduces artifacts and improves mean density errors in material density images. All dual energy postprocessing methods that are in use today, such as bone removal, virtual noncontrast images, etc., can be applied to the images provided by MDIR.
Similar articles
-
Iterative dual energy material decomposition from spatial mismatched raw data sets.J Xray Sci Technol. 2014;22(6):745-62. doi: 10.3233/XST-140459. J Xray Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 25408391
-
Combined iterative reconstruction and image-domain decomposition for dual energy CT using total-variation regularization.Med Phys. 2014 May;41(5):051909. doi: 10.1118/1.4870375. Med Phys. 2014. PMID: 24784388
-
A general framework of noise suppression in material decomposition for dual-energy CT.Med Phys. 2015 Aug;42(8):4848-62. doi: 10.1118/1.4926780. Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26233212
-
Strategies to Improve Image Quality on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.Radiol Clin North Am. 2018 Jul;56(4):641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2018.03.006. Epub 2018 May 4. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 29936952 Review.
-
Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Sep;17(3):181-94. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3860-10.0. Epub 2010 Nov 14. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20945292 Review.
Cited by
-
Dual energy CT reconstruction using the constrained one step spectral image reconstruction algorithm.Med Phys. 2024 Apr;51(4):2648-2664. doi: 10.1002/mp.16788. Epub 2023 Oct 14. Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 37837648
-
Feasibility of use of medical dual energy scanner for forensic detection and characterization of explosives, a phantom study.Int J Legal Med. 2020 Sep;134(5):1915-1925. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02315-y. Epub 2020 May 23. Int J Legal Med. 2020. PMID: 32444948
-
Quantitative analysis of therapeutic response in psoriatic arthritis of digital joints with Dual-energy CT iodine maps.Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 27;10(1):1225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58235-9. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 31988331 Free PMC article.
-
Obtaining dual-energy computed tomography (CT) information from a single-energy CT image for quantitative imaging analysis of living subjects by using deep learning.Pac Symp Biocomput. 2020;25:139-148. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2020. PMID: 31797593 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of raw-data-based and calculated electron density for contrast media with a dual-energy CT technique.Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Aug 20. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019. PMID: 31467491 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources