The ethics of elective psychopharmacology
- PMID: 21396152
- PMCID: PMC3325502
- DOI: 10.1017/S146114571100037X
The ethics of elective psychopharmacology
Abstract
Pharmacological cognitive enhancers (PCEs) are used to improve cognitive functions, such as attention, learning, memory and planning in patients with impairments in cognition resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI) or from neuropsychiatric disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, schizophrenia, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Moreover, PCEs have been shown to improve cognition in healthy volunteers with no psychiatric disorders. This article describes the rationale behind the need for their use in neuropsychiatric patients and illustrates how PCEs can ameliorate cognitive impairments, improve quality of life and wellbeing, and therefore reduce the economic burden associated with these disorders. We also describe evidence that PCEs are being used as cognitive enhancers by healthy people. Crucially, as the lifestyle use of these drugs becomes very popular in the healthy population, a final aim is to present an overview of the current and future neuroethical considerations of enhancing the healthy brain. As information regarding their actual use, benefits and harms in various healthy populations is currently lacking, we propose research that aims to obtain relevant empirical data, monitor the short- and long-term effectiveness and side-effects, and initiate accurate surveys to determine current patterns and quantity of usage of PCE drugs by healthy people. Furthermore, in order to instigate a dialogue between neuroethics and neuropsychopharmacology, we urge scientists to explore and communicate the social and ethical implications of their research to the public. Finally, we discuss and highlight other means of enhancing cognition in both patients and healthy adults, including education and physical exercise.
Similar articles
-
Neuroethical issues in pharmacological cognitive enhancement.Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;5(5):533-549. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1306. Epub 2014 Jul 28. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014. PMID: 26308743
-
Neuroethical issues in cognitive enhancement.J Psychopharmacol. 2011 Feb;25(2):197-204. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106926. Epub 2010 Mar 8. J Psychopharmacol. 2011. PMID: 20212064 Review.
-
Focusing the Neuroscience and Societal Implications of Cognitive Enhancers.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Feb;101(2):170-172. doi: 10.1002/cpt.457. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017. PMID: 27557349
-
Dementia -- Caring, Ethics, Ethnical and Economical Aspects: A Systematic Review [Internet].Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2008 Jun. SBU Assessment No. 172. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2008 Jun. SBU Assessment No. 172. PMID: 28876770 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
The impact of neuroscience on society: cognitive enhancement in neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy people.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Sep 19;370(1677):20140214. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0214. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26240429 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Benefits and Harms of 'Smart Drugs' (Nootropics) in Healthy Individuals.Drugs. 2022 Apr;82(6):633-647. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01701-7. Epub 2022 Apr 2. Drugs. 2022. PMID: 35366192 Review.
-
The Psychonauts' World of Cognitive Enhancers.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;11:546796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.546796. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 33024436 Free PMC article.
-
Modafinil increases the latency of response in the Hayling Sentence Completion Test in healthy volunteers: a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e110639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110639. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25391155 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The value and pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement.Med Health Care Philos. 2014 Aug;17(3):325-37. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9539-4. Med Health Care Philos. 2014. PMID: 24402841
-
Enhance, delete, incept: manipulating hippocampus-dependent memories.Brain Res Bull. 2014 Jun;105(100):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 4. Brain Res Bull. 2014. PMID: 24397964 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Academy of Medical Sciences. Brain Science, Addiction and Drugs: Working Group Report Chaired by Professor Sir Gabriel Horn. Foresight Brain Science, Addiction and Drugs Project. London: Office of Science and Technology; 2008.
-
- Ajibola O, Clement PW. Differential effects of methylphenidate and self-reinforcement on attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Modification. 1995;19:211–233. - PubMed
-
- Altamura AC, Glick ID. Designing outcome studies to determine efficacy and safety of antipsychotics for ‘real world’ treatment of schizophrenia: trends and Perspectives. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;13:971–973. - PubMed
-
- Alzheimer's Association. 2005. http://www.alz.org/national/documents/topicsheet_treatments.pdf. http://www.alz.org/national/documents/topicsheet_treatments.pdf ). FDA-approved treatments for Alzheimer's ( ). Accessed November 2010.
-
- Alzheimer's Research Trust. Dementia 2010: the economic burden of dementia and associated research funding in the United Kingdom. Health Economics Research Centre. Alzheimer's Research Trust; 2010. pp. 1–38.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials