GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
- PMID: 21208779
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Abstract
This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (confidence in the estimates of effect)].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(6):449-56. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22857733 German.
-
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21195583
-
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x. Allergy. 2009. PMID: 19210357 Review.
-
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256168 Review.
-
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21185693
Cited by
-
The impact of long-term care interventions on healthcare utilisation among older persons: a scoping review of reviews.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05097-9. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38831269 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0304031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304031. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38809911 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of virtual reality OSCE on nursing students' education: a study protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2024 May 28;14(5):e082847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082847. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38806420 Free PMC article.
-
Hemodiafiltration versus Hemodialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Kidney Med. 2024 Apr 18;6(6):100829. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100829. eCollection 2024 Jun. Kidney Med. 2024. PMID: 38799785 Free PMC article.
-
The association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic sclerosis and its complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Immunol. 2024 May 10;15:1395993. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1395993. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38799443 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources