Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;57(2):104-108.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.07.015.

National survey of preventive health services in US emergency departments

M Kit Delgado  1 , Colleen D Acosta, Adit A Ginde, N Ewen Wang, Matthew C Strehlow, Yash S Khandwala, Carlos A Camargo Jr
Affiliations

National survey of preventive health services in US emergency departments

M Kit Delgado et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Study objective: We describe the availability of preventive health services in US emergency departments (EDs), as well as ED directors' preferred service and perceptions of barriers to offering preventive services.

Methods: Using the 2007 National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI)-USA, we randomly sampled 350 (7%) of 4,874 EDs. We surveyed directors of these EDs to determine the availability of (1) screening and referral programs for alcohol, tobacco, geriatric falls, intimate partner violence, HIV, diabetes, and hypertension; (2) vaccination programs for influenza and pneumococcus; and (3) linkage programs to primary care and health insurance. ED directors were asked to select the service they would most like to implement and to rate 5 potential barriers to offering preventive services.

Results: Two hundred seventy-seven EDs (80%) responded across 46 states. Availability of services ranged from 66% for intimate partner violence screening to 19% for HIV screening. ED directors wanted to implement primary care linkage most (17%) and HIV screening least (2%). ED directors "agreed/strongly agreed" that the following are barriers to ED preventive care: cost (74%), increased patient length of stay (64%), lack of follow-up (60%), resource shifting leading to worse patient outcomes (53%), and philosophical opposition (27%).

Conclusion: Most US EDs offer preventive services, but availability and ED director preference for type of service vary greatly. The majority of EDs do not routinely offer Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended HIV screening. Most ED directors are not philosophically opposed to offering preventive services but are concerned with added costs, effects on ED operations, and potential lack of follow-up.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Availability and preference for ED preventive services according to ED directors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ED director perceptions of commonly cited barriers to implementing ED preventive services. The light gray bars represent the proportion of ED directors who agree with listed statements. The dark gray bars represent the proportion of ED directors who strongly agree with listed statements.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rhodes KV, Gordon JA, Lowe RA Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group. Preventive care in the emergency department, part I: clinical preventive services—are they relevant to emergency medicine? Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1036–1041. - PubMed
    1. Irvin CB, Wyer PC, Gerson LW. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group. Preventive care in the emergency department, part II: clinical preventive services—an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1042–1054. - PubMed
    1. Bernstein SL, D’Onofrio G. Public health in the emergency department: Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference executive summary. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16:1037–1039. - PubMed
    1. Kelen GD. Public health initiatives in the emergency department: not so good for the public health? Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:194–197. - PubMed
    1. Trautman DE, McCarthy ML, Miller N, et al. Intimate partner violence and emergency department screening: computerized screening versus usual care. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:526–534. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms