Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;150(2):268-274.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.030. Epub 2010 May 20.

Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Affiliations

Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Norman R Harden et al. Pain. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Current IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS have low specificity, potentially leading to overdiagnosis. This validation study compared current IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS to proposed new diagnostic criteria (the "Budapest Criteria") regarding diagnostic accuracy. Structured evaluations of CRPS-related signs and symptoms were conducted in 113 CRPS-I and 47 non-CRPS neuropathic pain patients. Discriminating between diagnostic groups based on presence of signs or symptoms meeting IASP criteria showed high diagnostic sensitivity (1.00), but poor specificity (0.41), replicating prior work. In comparison, the Budapest clinical criteria retained the exceptional sensitivity of the IASP criteria (0.99), but greatly improved upon the specificity (0.68). As designed, the Budapest research criteria resulted in the highest specificity (0.79), again replicating prior work. Analyses indicated that inclusion of four distinct CRPS components in the Budapest Criteria contributed to enhanced specificity. Overall, results corroborate the validity of the Budapest Criteria and suggest they improve upon existing IASP diagnostic criteria for CRPS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have a conflict of interest as to this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amadio PC, Mackinnon SE, Merritt WH, Brody GS, Terzis JK. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome: consensus report of an ad hoc committee of the American Association for Hand Surgery on the definition of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87:371–5. - PubMed
    1. Birklein F, Schmelz M. Neuropeptides, neurogenic inflammation and complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) Neurosci Lett. 2008;437:199–202. - PubMed
    1. Birklein F, Riedl B, Claus D, Neudorfer B. Pattern of autonomic dysfunction in time course of complex regional pain syndrome. Clin Auton Res. 1998;8:79–85. - PubMed
    1. Blumberg H. A new clinical approach for diagnosing reflex sympathetic dystrophy. In: Bond MR, Charlton JE, Woolf CJ, editors. Proceedings of the VIth world congress on pain. New York: Elsevier; 1991. pp. 399–407.
    1. Bruehl S, Lubenow TR, Nath H, Ivankovich O. Validation of thermography in the diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Clin J Pain. 1996;12:316–25. - PubMed

Publication types