The "shoulds" and "should nots" of moral emotions: a self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt
- PMID: 20008966
- DOI: 10.1177/0146167209356788
The "shoulds" and "should nots" of moral emotions: a self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt
Abstract
A self-regulatory framework for distinguishing between shame and guilt was tested in three studies. Recently, two forms of moral regulation based on approach versus avoidance motivation have been proposed in the literature. Proscriptive regulation is sensitive to negative outcomes, inhibition based, and focused on what we should not do. Prescriptive regulation is sensitive to positive outcomes, activation based, and focused on what we should do. In the current research, consistent support was found for shame's proscriptive and guilt's prescriptive moral underpinnings. Study 1 found a positive association between avoidance orientation and shame proneness and between approach orientation and guilt proneness. In Study 2, priming a proscriptive orientation increased shame and priming a prescriptive orientation increased guilt. In Study 3, transgressions most apt to represent proscriptive and prescriptive violations predicted subsequent judgments of shame and guilt, respectively. This self-regulatory perspective provides a broad interpretive framework for understanding and extending past research findings.
Similar articles
-
Feelings of shame, embarrassment and guilt and their neural correlates: A systematic review.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:455-471. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016. PMID: 27687818 Review.
-
Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):947-66. doi: 10.1037/a0022641. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21517196
-
Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: two faces of moral regulation.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):521-37. doi: 10.1037/a0013779. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19254101
-
Measuring shame and guilt by self-report questionnaires: a validation study.Psychiatry Res. 2007 Apr 15;150(3):313-25. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.04.018. Epub 2007 Feb 23. Psychiatry Res. 2007. PMID: 17320971
-
Emotion, regulation, and moral development.Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:665-97. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.665. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000. PMID: 10751984 Review.
Cited by
-
Motives matter: The psychological experience of ostracizing among sources.PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0303510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303510. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38820524 Free PMC article.
-
Dispositional employability and self-regulation in antisocial and prosocial personalities: different contributions to employability.BMC Psychol. 2023 Jan 9;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01037-1. BMC Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36624541 Free PMC article.
-
Feeling One Thing and Doing Another: How Expressions of Guilt and Shame Influence Hypocrisy Judgment.Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;12(12):504. doi: 10.3390/bs12120504. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36546987 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Guilt and Empathy on Prosocial Behavior.Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Mar 1;12(3):64. doi: 10.3390/bs12030064. Behav Sci (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35323383 Free PMC article.
-
My Fault? Coworker Incivility and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Moderating Role of Attribution Orientation on State Guilt.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 1;12:683843. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683843. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34276506 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous