US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues
- PMID: 19729378
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dep309
US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues
Abstract
Background: First-person reports of oocyte donors, years after their donation, can give valuable information about medical complications of oocyte donation, as well as changes potentially required in procedures and priorities of US-based in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers. This paper reports findings from an online survey of former oocyte donors.
Methods: The instrument was an author-constructed questionnaire completed online on the Donor Sibling Registry website. Questions assessed women's accounts of medical complications, contact with the infertility clinic through which they had provided ova, and information exchange or contact with people conceived from their ova.
Results: Responses were received from 49.1% of the 287 donors with valid e-mail addresses. The 155 respondents completed the survey an average of 9.4 years after their first donation. Reported medical complications included ovarian hypersensitivity syndrome (30.3%) and infertility (9.6%). Subsequent to ova donation, 2.6% of women reported that they had been contacted by the IVF clinic for medical updates. On the questionnaire, 34.2% of women reported that medical changes they thought would interest donor children; half said that they had attempted to report these changes to the clinic with variable results. Many, who did not report such information, did not realize they could or should. Donors said that they frequently had not sought information about pregnancy outcomes because of confusion about the definition of 'anonymity' or 'confidentiality'.
Conclusions: US-based IVF clinics need to give clearer guidelines to anonymous oocyte donors about follow-up information exchange. Additional long-term studies are needed to ascertain oocyte donors' risks of infertility or cancer.
Similar articles
-
The incidence of both serious and minor complications in young women undergoing oocyte donation.Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.065. Epub 2008 Feb 4. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 18249368
-
Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Mar;77(3):317-21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998. PMID: 9539279
-
Looking back: egg donors' retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle.Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):455-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.081. Epub 2008 Nov 19. Fertil Steril. 2010. PMID: 19022427
-
[Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007 Dec;36(8):727-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.06.012. Epub 2007 Sep 11. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007. PMID: 17850990 Review. French.
-
Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):450-65. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw006. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Hum Reprod Update. 2016. PMID: 27016289 Review.
Cited by
-
Egg donor self-reports of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: severity by trigger type, oocytes retrieved, and prior history.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Jun;40(6):1291-1304. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02855-3. Epub 2023 Jun 22. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 37347350 Free PMC article.
-
Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Sep 19;12:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003. eCollection 2021 Mar. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020. PMID: 33024845 Free PMC article.
-
Payment to gamete donors: equality, gender equity, or solidarity?J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jan;37(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01625-4. Epub 2019 Nov 17. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020. PMID: 31734858 Free PMC article.
-
Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Dec 7;5:59. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0117-0. eCollection 2016. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016. PMID: 27980721 Free PMC article.
-
Egg donation brokers: an analysis of agency versus in vitro fertilization clinic websites.J Reprod Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(11-12):534-41. J Reprod Med. 2014. PMID: 25552124 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources