A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of chiropractic and medical prophylactic treatment of adults with tension-type headache: results from a stopped trial
- PMID: 19539116
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.04.004
A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of chiropractic and medical prophylactic treatment of adults with tension-type headache: results from a stopped trial
Erratum in
- J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(9):804
Abstract
Objectives: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common headache experienced by adults in Western society. Only 2 clinical trials of spinal manipulation for adult tension-type headache have been reported, neither of which was fully controlled. In 1 trial, spinal manipulation was compared to amitriptyline. There is an urgent need for well-controlled studies of chiropractic spinal manipulation for TTH. This trial was stopped prematurely due to poor recruitment. The purposes of this report are (1) to describe the trial protocol, as it contained several novel features, (2) to report the limited data set obtained from our sample of completed subjects, and (3) to discuss the problems that were encountered in conducting this study.
Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a factorial design in which adult TTH sufferers with more than 10 headaches per month were randomly assigned to four groups: real cervical manipulation + real amitriptyline, real cervical manipulation + placebo amitriptyline, sham cervical manipulation + real amitriptyline, and sham cervical manipulation + placebo amitriptyline. A baseline period of four weeks was followed by a treatment period of 14 weeks. The primary outcome was headache frequency obtained from a headache diary in the last 28 days of the treatment period.
Results: Nineteen subjects completed the trial. In the unadjusted analysis, a statistically significant main effect of chiropractic treatment was obtained (-2.2 [-10.2 to 5.8], P = .03) which was just below the 3-day reduction set for clinical importance. As well, a clinically important [corrected] effect of the combined therapies was obtained (-9 [-20.8 [corrected] to 2.9], P = .13), but this did not achieve statistical significance. In the adjusted analysis, neither the main effects of chiropractic nor amitriptyline were statistically significant or clinically important; however, the effect of the combined treatments was -8.4 (-15.8 to -1.1) which was statistically significant (P = .03) and reached our criterion for clinical importance.
Conclusion: Although the sample size was smaller than initially required, a statistically significant and clinically important effect was obtained for the combined treatment group. There are considerable difficulties with recruitment of subjects in such a trial. This trial should be replicated with a larger sample.
Similar articles
-
Spinal manipulation vs. amitriptyline for the treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: a randomized clinical trial.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;18(3):148-54. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995. PMID: 7790794 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of spinal manipulation, amitriptyline and the combination of both therapies for the prophylaxis of migraine headache.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Oct;21(8):511-9. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998. PMID: 9798179 Clinical Trial.
-
The effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of headache: an exploration in the literature.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995 Nov-Dec;18(9):611-17. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1995. PMID: 8775024
-
Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of spinal manipulation and mobilization in tension-type headache, migraine, and cervicogenic headache.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;36(3):160-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.3.160. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006. PMID: 16596892 Review.
-
Physical treatments for headache: a structured review.Headache. 2005 Jun;45(6):738-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.05141.x. Headache. 2005. PMID: 15953306 Review.
Cited by
-
Acupuncture versus tricyclic antidepressants in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headaches: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis.J Headache Pain. 2024 Apr 29;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01776-5. J Headache Pain. 2024. PMID: 38679721 Free PMC article.
-
Recruitment and retention for chronic pain clinical trials: a narrative review.Pain Rep. 2022 Jun 21;7(4):e1007. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001007. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug. Pain Rep. 2022. PMID: 38304397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Informed consent, duty of disclosure and chiropractic: where are we?Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Nov 4;28(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00342-5. Chiropr Man Therap. 2020. PMID: 33148281 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing and treating primary headaches and cranio-facial pain in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases.J Headache Pain. 2017 Sep 29;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0809-z. J Headache Pain. 2017. PMID: 28963668 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tricyclic and Tetracyclic Antidepressants for the Prevention of Frequent Episodic or Chronic Tension-Type Headache in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec;32(12):1351-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4121-z. Epub 2017 Jul 18. J Gen Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28721535 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials