Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self-other integration between relationship partners
- PMID: 19469592
- DOI: 10.1037/a0013882
Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self-other integration between relationship partners
Abstract
Perceiving similarity between oneself and one's romantic partner benefits both the individual and the relationship and can arise from multiple pathways that draw either the partner closer to the self or the self closer to the partner. The current research focuses on the latter. The authors investigate novel circumstances under which the self-concepts of individuals in romantic relationships may intertwine. Although self-other integration typically grows from the depth of shared experiences between relationship partners, the current research proposes a secondary pathway through which self-other integration may occur: Specifically, motivation to draw close to a romantic partner may be sufficient to evoke self-other integration even in the absence of shared experience. In 6 studies, the authors explored this anticipatory self-other integration pathway, using both current and potential romantic partners. The results supported the hypotheses by demonstrating that self-other integration can occur in an anticipatory fashion with the appropriate motivation.
Similar articles
-
Feeling better about doing worse: social comparisons within romantic relationships.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):80-95. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.80. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004. PMID: 15250794
-
Only because I love you: why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships.J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):887-904. doi: 10.1037/a0021857. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21244176
-
When you accept me for me: the relational benefits of intrinsic affirmations from one's relationship partner.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1439-53. doi: 10.1177/0146167210384881. Epub 2010 Oct 14. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010. PMID: 20947775
-
Through the eyes of love: reality and illusion in intimate relationships.Psychol Bull. 2010 Jul;136(4):627-58. doi: 10.1037/a0019792. Psychol Bull. 2010. PMID: 20565171 Review.
-
Self-monitoring and close relationships.J Pers. 2006 Jun;74(3):739-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00391.x. J Pers. 2006. PMID: 16684252 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-partner inclusion predicts performance of romantically involved individuals in a body-scaled action-anticipation task.PLoS One. 2021 May 18;16(5):e0251425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251425. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34003833 Free PMC article.
-
A Dyadic Perspective on Sexual Subjectivity and Romantic Relationship Functioning.J Relatsh Res. 2019;10:e22. doi: 10.1017/jrr.2019.18. Epub 2019 Sep 30. J Relatsh Res. 2019. PMID: 33777242 Free PMC article.
-
Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4475-6. Epub 2015 Nov 2. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 26525711 Free PMC article.
-
Social Relationships and Health: The Toxic Effects of Perceived Social Isolation.Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2014 Feb 1;8(2):58-72. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12087. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2014. PMID: 24839458 Free PMC article.
-
Neural correlates of own and close-other's name recognition: ERP evidence.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 4;8:194. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00194. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24772076 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical