'Negativity bias' in risk for depression and anxiety: brain-body fear circuitry correlates, 5-HTT-LPR and early life stress
- PMID: 19446647
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.009
'Negativity bias' in risk for depression and anxiety: brain-body fear circuitry correlates, 5-HTT-LPR and early life stress
Abstract
The INTEGRATE Model draws on the framework of 'integrative neuroscience' to bring together brain-body and behavioral concepts of emotion, thinking and feeling and their regulation. The key organizing principle is the drive to 'minimize danger and maximize reward' that determines what is significant to us at each point in time. Traits of 'negativity bias' reflect the tendency to perceive danger rather than reward related information, and this bias influences emotion, thinking and feeling processes. Here, we examined a self-report measure of Negativity Bias in relation to its impact on brain and body correlates of emotion processing. The contributions of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT-LPR) allelic variants and early life stress to both negativity bias and these correlates were also examined. Data were accessed in collaboration with the Brain Resource International Database (BRID) which provides standardized data across these domains of measurement. From an initial sample of 303 nonclinical subjects from the BRID, subjects scoring one standard deviation below (n=55) and above (n=47) the mean on the measure of negativity bias were identified as 'Negativity Bias' and 'Positivity Bias' groups for analysis, respectively. These subjects had been genotyped for 5-HTT-LPR Short allele versus LL homozygote status, and completed the early life stress scale, and recording of startle responses and heart rate for conscious and nonconscious fear conditions. A matched subset (n=39) of BRID subjects completed functional MRI with the same facial emotion tasks. The Negativity Bias (compared to Positivity Bias) group was distinguished by both arousal and brain function correlates: higher startle amplitude, higher heart rate for conscious and nonconscious fear conditions, and heightened activation in neural circuitry for both fear conditions. Regions of heightened activation included brainstem and bilateral amygdala, anterior cingulate and ventral and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) for conscious fear, and brainstem and right-sided amygdala, anterior cingulate and ventral, mPFC for nonconscious fear. The 5-HTT-LPR Short allele (versus LL) conferred a similar pattern of arousal and neural activation. For those with the 5-HTT-LPR Short allele, the addition of early life stress contributed to enhanced negativity bias, and to further effects on heart rate and neural activation for nonconscious fear in particular. These findings suggest that traits of negativity bias impact brain-body arousal correlates of fear circuitry. Both genetic variation and life stressors contribute to the impact of negativity bias. Given that negativity bias is a feature of conditions such as depression and associated biological alterations, the findings have implications for translation into clinical decision support.
Similar articles
-
Neural biases to covert and overt signals of fear: dissociation by trait anxiety and depression.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Oct;19(10):1595-608. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1595. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17854280
-
An "integrative neuroscience" platform: application to profiles of negativity and positivity bias.J Integr Neurosci. 2008 Sep;7(3):345-66. J Integr Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18988297
-
Interactions between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and early life stress predict brain and arousal pathways to syndromal depression and anxiety.Mol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;14(7):681-95. doi: 10.1038/mp.2008.143. Epub 2009 Jan 20. Mol Psychiatry. 2009. PMID: 19153574
-
Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition.Nat Neurosci. 2007 Sep;10(9):1103-9. doi: 10.1038/nn1964. Nat Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17726476 Review.
-
Negative biases and risk for depression; integrating self-report and emotion task markers.Depress Anxiety. 2011 Aug;28(8):703-18. doi: 10.1002/da.20854. Depress Anxiety. 2011. PMID: 21796742 Review.
Cited by
-
The Identification of Potential Anti-Depression/Anxiety Drug Targets by Stress-Induced Rat Brain Regional Proteome and Network Analyses.Neurochem Res. 2024 Aug 1. doi: 10.1007/s11064-024-04220-x. Online ahead of print. Neurochem Res. 2024. PMID: 39088164
-
Beneficial effects of mindfulness-based intervention on hippocampal volumes and episodic memory for childhood adversity survivors.J Affect Disord Rep. 2024 Apr;16:100769. doi: 10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100769. Epub 2024 Mar 23. J Affect Disord Rep. 2024. PMID: 38737193 Free PMC article.
-
Transdiagnostic phenomena of psychopathology in the context of the RDoC: protocol of a multimodal cross-sectional study.BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;11(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01335-8. BMC Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37770998 Free PMC article.
-
Attributional negativity bias and acute stress disorder symptoms mediate the association between trauma history and future posttraumatic stress disorder.J Trauma Stress. 2023 Aug;36(4):785-795. doi: 10.1002/jts.22942. Epub 2023 Jun 20. J Trauma Stress. 2023. PMID: 37339014 Free PMC article.
-
Emotional Tone, Analytical Thinking, and Somatosensory Processes of a Sample of Italian Tweets During the First Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 27;23(10):e29820. doi: 10.2196/29820. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 34516386 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical