Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience
- PMID: 18636263
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0312-x
Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience
Abstract
Objectives: The diagnosis of penile cancer can be devastating for a man and his partner. The fear of cancer is heightened by the prospect of penile amputation. While conventional radical surgery continues to be an effective approach to management, the emasculating nature of this treatment has serious psychological and sexual morbidity. Recent studies have challenged the traditional belief that a 2 cm margin was required for adequate oncological control.
Methods: We review the current options and status of such penile preserving techniques in the modern day management of penile cancer, and assess the use of the different techniques according to the stage and grade of disease based upon the combined experience of two superregional centres in the United Kingdom.
Results: A range of organ preserving procedures matches the clinical spectrum of patients presenting with penile cancer. These demonstrate excellent oncological control whilst maximizing penile function and form.
Conclusion: Innovative surgical techniques can now preserve as much penile tissue and functional integrity as possible, without compromising oncological control. This minimizes the impact of disease and its treatment on the quality of life of the patient.
Similar articles
-
Advances in Penile-Preserving Surgical Approaches in the Management of Penile Tumors.Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Nov;43(4):427-434. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Aug 11. Urol Clin North Am. 2016. PMID: 27717429 Review.
-
Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 May;13(5):249-57. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.54. Epub 2016 Mar 22. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27001013 Review.
-
Localized disease: types of reconstruction/plastic surgery techniques after glans resurfacing/glansectomy/partial/total penectomy.Curr Opin Urol. 2020 Mar;30(2):213-217. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000711. Curr Opin Urol. 2020. PMID: 31895889 Review.
-
Oncological and Functional Outcomes After Organ-Sparing Plastic Reconstructive Surgery for Penile Cancer.Urology. 2020 Aug;142:161-165.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058. Epub 2020 May 5. Urology. 2020. PMID: 32380155
-
Update on organ preserving surgical strategies for penile cancer.Urol Oncol. 2022 May;40(5):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Feb 17. Urol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 33610446 Review.
Cited by
-
Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments.Res Rep Urol. 2023 Jun 2;15:165-174. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S387228. eCollection 2023. Res Rep Urol. 2023. PMID: 37288454 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Profile and Predictors of Survival in Carcinoma Penis Patients.Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 28;30(5):4563-4574. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30050345. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37232803 Free PMC article.
-
Auricular Cartilage Composite Graft for Glans Reconstruction After Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.Eplasty. 2022 Jun 30;22:e24. eCollection 2022. Eplasty. 2022. PMID: 35903427 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual function in the penile cancer survivor: a narrative review.Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2544-2553. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1228. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34295742 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Progress on Management of Penile Cancer in 2020.Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020 Nov 23;22(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-00802-3. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2020. PMID: 33230601 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources